Antitrust + Trade Regulation Litigation

Antitrust + Trade Regulation Litigation

Kegler Brown represents business clients in disputes relating to all aspects of the laws governing business competition. From civil litigation, including class actions, to criminal prosecution or investigations involving federal or state enforcement authorities, we have experienced attorneys with the expertise to represent you in these matters.

Our Services

  • Civil antitrust litigation defense: including traditional cases, as well as class actions, involving accusations of price-fixing, bid-rigging, territorial allocation, monopolization, unlawful pricing, and unlawful collaboration with competitors
  • Criminal antitrust investigations: including the representation of individuals and corporations prosecuted by state or federal enforcement authorities
  • Non-competition agreement enforcement: enforcement of employment agreements, including protection of confidential information and trade secrets; enforcement of restrictions regarding post-employment competition; prevention of the solicitation of customers and employees
  • Non-competition agreement defense: defense of employees faced with unreasonable non-competition restrictions or allegations of the misappropriation of confidential information or trade secrets
  • Litigation challenging anti-competitive conduct: asserting claims on behalf of businesses that are victims of anti-competitive business conduct

Our Clients

We represent companies of all sizes that have either been accused of, or are victims of, unlawful anti-competitive business conduct, including clients who have a significant market share in their geographic region and product market. Our clients typically include commodity businesses, product manufacturers and resellers, and service-oriented businesses.

Kegler Brown has a history highlighted by successfully defending clients in antitrust and trade regulation litigation. This experience includes representing some of the best-known brands in the U.S., including:

  • defending one of the largest producers of food and dairy products in the U.S. in price-fixing and customer allocation litigation brought by the Ohio Attorney General’s office;
  • representing one of the largest supermarket chains in the Midwest against supplier antitrust claims regarding exclusivity;
  • defending a privately owned global franchisor of animals and pet-related products against antitrust claims related to required supplier arrangements and marketing programs; and
  • representing one of the largest consumer credit reporting agencies in the world in antitrust claims related to the resale of credit information.

People

Robert Cohen

Director + Co-Chair, Litigation Practice

614-462-5492Email
Nicholas S. Bobb

Director + Co-Chair, Litigation Practice

614-462-5414Email

Experience

Bid-Rigging Litigation


Publications + Presentations

Article

Why Franchise Businesses Should Be Re-Evaluating Their “No-Poach” Provisions

Newsletter

The Post-Pandemic Future for M+A Activity

Each month, Eric Duffee looks at a different piece of The Anatomy of a Deal – a series of easy-to-digest articles that break down complicated aspects of business transactions – helping you better understand terms + processes that can shape the direction of your business. This piece is a collaboration with Bill Levendusky, an associate M+A lawyer at Kegler Brown who is working with business owners and corporate development professionals to plan their post-pandemic deal strategies.Smart Summary There will likely continue to be very little M+A activity in the short-term outside of distressed transactions. Private equity cash, eager investors, a solid pre-pandemic economy, and aggressive government stimulus set the stage for M+A to rebound. A true recovery will be inherent in improvement in economies abroad, progress in the treatment of COVID-19, and the successful re-opening of local economies. With the world economy in free-fall, it seems odd to be talking about the future of M+A activity. But there is reason to believe that M+A activity will rebound in the medium-term. So this month, we look at some of the reasons why deal volume may be poised to rally, and the signs we’re looking for to see when that improvement might occur. Why do we think a rebound is coming? First, let us emphasize that there are a lot of factors at play here. As such, it’s very hard to make any firm conclusions. In addition, we’re looking out a few months; there’s likely not going to be much conventional M+A activity in the short-term. There may be some distressed transactions (as we discussed last month), but many voluntary sellers—and the buyers who are interested in these targets—are waiting for some clarity and stability before jumping in. So with all the bad things happening now, what are the good things we see? A Mountain of PE Cash Private equity funds still have large capital stashes and are required to deploy that “dry powder” within a certain time period. So private equity funds are going to be aggressively looking for good deals. A “First-Mover” Advantage There has been some research as to whether buyers that jump into the M+A market earlier following a recession achieve better long-term results, and, although it’s not entirely conclusive, there is enough reason to believe that this potential will lead at least some buyers to test the M+A markets early on. Solid Pre-Pandemic Economic Indicators The economy was largely in good shape prior to the COVID-19 crisis. And while the timeline isn’t clear right now, the immediate public health threat will subside at some point in time. While there will be lasting damage to the economy, there is some hope that economic conditions could improve later in 2020 and continuing into 2021. Governments Pumping Liquidity into the Economy We’re not economists (but we did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night). That said, it doesn’t take a Ph.D. to see the massive amounts of stimulus and financial support being provided by world governments to respond to the crisis. Consumer spending in the U.S. (which accounts for approximately 70% of GDP) fell almost 9% in March, but the ongoing government stimulus should theoretically fill in for at least some of that loss. While there will undoubtedly be companies that don’t survive “The Great Pause,” there is hope that the government support will help most businesses weather the storm and be positioned for a rebound. What are the signs we’re looking for in a recovery? After the Great Recession of 2008-2009, we could all look back and agree that we should have invested a bunch of money into the stock market on March 6, 2009. So, if a relatively quick recovery is in the cards as we hope, then how will we know it’s coming? Before we answer that question, it’s worth noting that traditional economic indicators—those charts from 2009-2010 that showed clear trends indicating that the country was emerging from the Great Recession—may not be as useful or as easy to project as they were a decade ago. Unemployment is considered among the most reliable traditional metrics when measuring the strength of the economy. During the week ending April 11, 2020, “Seasonally Adjusted Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance,” according to the Department of Labor, numbered 5,245,000. The record for Unemployment claims in one week, prior to the COVID-19 crisis, was only 695,000, set in October 1982. During such extreme times, traditional metrics may prove less helpful. If the darkest hour is truly just before dawn, here are some of the signs we’re looking for to see when we’ve reached that point: Improvements OverseasAs many parts of the world—specifically China—began their response to the virus much sooner than the U.S., those regions will provide the first testing ground for determining how and whether economies can start functioning again. As China has begun to “re-open,” there are already reports of an uptick in M+A and investment activity there. At the same time, emerging markets, which often depend on foreign investment and tourism dollars, have been hit hard during this crisis. According to the Institute for International Finance, the economic impact of foreign capital fleeing emerging markets since January 21, 2020, may be three times worse than during the Great Recession. Investor confidence in emerging markets may be a key indicator of recovery, particularly with an eye toward those countries that were more effective at controlling the spread of COVID-19. Progress in the Fight against the CoronavirusOne of the best ways to bring about a quick change in economic conditions is for a medical breakthrough, such as a proven treatment for the virus that can provide a safeguard until a vaccine becomes available. Even if that doesn’t happen, some sustained success in avoiding a spike in new cases will be viewed as a win and start to restore investor confidence. Reopening of States and Local EconomiesWhile some states, such as Ohio, New York, and Texas, have announced plans to gradually re-open their economies, the process will undoubtedly be slow-moving. Ohio and Texas have announced plans to re-open in phases by business sector and New York has announced a plan to re-open in phases by geographic region. As states open their economies, look for consumer spending and wage growth to be on the move. Those factors—and how quickly the changes occur—may provide some insight into the U.S. economy’s health.This is uncharted territory for everyone, but there’s still reason for some optimism as of now. We continue to have numerous discussions with clients who are planning to move forward with transactions in the summer and fall. The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining how successful the rebound will be, and when we can expect it to occur. If fortune truly does favor the bold, then there may be some improvement on the horizon…at least we hope so. In May’s installment of Anatomy of a Deal, we will test this issue’s theories about market rebound and attempt to help owners track their business’s recovery against the economy more generally. Next Month: I'm Still Standing. Now What?Read last month’s piece: Crisis Demands Creativity in M+A

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
publication

5 Recommendations for Universities Facing Tuition Refund Class Action Suits

Smart Summary If your college or university sees a class action suit as a result of COVID-19, contract terms, including language of any force majeure clauses, will be critical.In addition to contract-based defenses, colleges + universities may look to procedural defenses and common law defenses like “impossibility” and “frustration of purpose.”Universities will want to think through their refund and future service credit offerings to try to minimize claims and any potential damages. In the wake of colleges and universities across the country turning to distance learning to minimize the spread of COVID-19, it is no surprise that putative class action complaints are now being filed seeking refunds and discounts on tuition and other fees paid by students. By now, you likely already know that cases have been filed against Purdue University, the University of Miami, Drexel University, and the Boards of Regents of both the University of Colorado and the University of Arizona. A number of these suits have been brought by the same law firm, which is attempting to attract new cases through its website “CollegeRefund2020.com.”Some of the suits seek reimbursement of a portion of paid tuition, based on the theory that the students contracted for an on-campus educational experience, which has not been provided. Other suits seek reimbursement of a portion of paid housing, meal plan expenses, and/or other service fees relating to athletic facilities, medical services or other amenities.For in-house counsel at universities across the country who are pondering whether their institution will be the next target of these lawsuits, we’ve outlined five key questions you should be considering if (and even before) your institution is sued.What are the contract terms? The claims being filed are predominantly contract claims, so the specific language of your institution’s contractual relationships with its students will be important. The applicable terms may specifically address refunds, school closures, and emergency circumstances. Is “force majeure” a defense? You and your outside counsel should consider whether there are any contractual force majeure provisions that may relieve performance in the event of some unforeseeable circumstance like a nationwide pandemic. Again, the specific language of your force majeure provision is important.Are there common law defenses? Even if the contractual language at issue does not contain a force majeure provision, certain common law defenses may be available, depending upon the jurisdiction in which any suit is brought and the applicable law. Common law principles of “impossibility” and “frustration of purpose” can, under some circumstances, provide a defense.Are there procedural defenses? In addition to contract-based defenses, procedural defenses may also be available to you. An institution that has been sued will want to consider: whether personal jurisdiction exists in the jurisdiction in which the suit has been brought; whether the named plaintiff is an appropriate representative of the putative class; how the class or classes have been defined; and whether the traditional legal requirements for each claim have been met. Unjust enrichment claims are included in several of the early cases. The law of most states holds that claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment are mutually exclusive, although many states allow plaintiffs to plead both, subject to later proof and/or choice of remedy.What can be done to minimize claims and potential damages? The relevant facts vary from university to university. Some universities have allowed students to remain in student housing and to continue to receive meals pursuant to their meal plan, while other universities have ceased housing and cafeteria operations entirely. Some universities have offered refunds or partial refunds, while others have not. Ensuring students stay on track to receive course credits toward graduation during periods of necessary distance learning will help to mitigate potential damages. Institutions that think creatively and take steps to introduce new ways of fostering community engagement and mentorship that would otherwise take place in residence halls will also be in a better position to defend tuition claims. For example, if a student took History 101 during the mandated period of distance learning, allowing him or her the option to re-take the class in-person once school resumes may be a productive way to mitigate potential damages. Similar options may exist for meal, athletic and health services. However, similar options may not exist with respect to housing availability. While closure decisions may already have been made, universities will want to think through their refund and future service credit offerings to try to minimize claims and any potential damages.No matter the course of action you choose, college and university counsel should be in close communication with their outside counsel partners, in particular those with substantial class action experience. Discussing these and other potential defense strategies can give your institution a head start on any litigation that may be headed your way.Vinita Mehra is a director and chair of Kegler Brown’s Global Education practice group, and works with college and university clients across the country on their operational and strategic planning issues. She can be reached directly at vmehra@keglerbrown.com or (614) 255-5518.Lori Fuhrer and Robert Cohen are directors and experienced trial lawyers in Kegler Brown’s Class + Collective Action practice, where they defend clients in contract and class action litigation of all kinds.Fuhrer can be reached directly at lfuhrer@keglerbrown.com or (614) 462-5474.Cohen can be reached directly at rcohen@keglerbrown.com or (614) 462-5492. 

publication

Winning at Trial

On November 20, Tom spoke during a one-day trial advocacy seminar featuring several of Ohio’s leading trial lawyers. Attendees were taken through the trial process, gaining insight on tactics and strategies leading up to and during trial. Topics discussed also included approaches to pre-trial discovery, preparing for trial, jury selection, opening statements, direct and cross examinations, and closing arguments. Tom spoke on cross examinations, giving step-by-step guidance on preparing questions and emphasizing the importance of organization. 

OSBA webinar cosponsored by the ACTL
publication

The Art of Witness Preparation

On August 9, 2019, Tom presented to the Legal Aid Society of Columbus on the oft-overlooked topic of teaching witnesses to be witnesses. While most educational programming for lawyers focuses on what they must do in a courtroom, little guidance is provided for preparing witnesses, who are speaking in an alien environment and are often frightened and uncertain. Focusing on a witness’s role in persuading a jury, Tom described to attendees how to work with a witness to tell a story using organized, open-ended questions that allow the witness to comfortably tell their portion of the truth. He discussed preparing for direct and cross-examination, as well as the importance of not over-preparing. 

Legal Aid Society of Columbus