Transactional Tax Planning

Transactional Tax Planning

Kegler Brown's transactional tax planning attorneys provide clients with efficient solutions to enhance economic return by minimizing tax costs.

We regularly advise entrepreneurs, closely held businesses and their owners, and domestic and foreign multinational corporations. Our tax attorneys partner with lawyers in multiple practice areas to provide integrated services related to evaluating, negotiating and structuring a wide variety of transactions.

Our Services

Our tax attorneys have extensive experience with the tax ramifications relating to:

  • Corporations, partnerships, LLCs and joint venture arrangements, including exempt and for-profit organizations
  • Taxable and tax-free reorganizations, liquidations, mergers and acquisitions
  • Taxation of real estate transactions, including New Market tax credits, real estate funds and joint ventures
  • Executive compensation arrangements, including stock options, restricted stock grants, stock appreciation rights plans and other equity-based plans
  • Structure and taxation of tax-exempt and philanthropic organizations
  • Strategic state and local tax-saving opportunities
  • Debt workouts
  • Income taxation of trusts and estates and income tax aspects of estate planning
  • Charitable giving

Our tax attorneys also provide counsel on foreign tax matters, including structuring inbound and outbound investments, branch profits tax, transfer pricing, interest-stripping, tax withholding, and tax treaties. We advise on the establishment of foreign entities, including hybrid entities, controlled foreign corporations and passive foreign investment companies; we also focus on maximizing foreign tax credits on worldwide income and on tax residency issues.

Our Clients

We primarily serve entrepreneurs and middle market businesses headquartered in Ohio; most are organized as LLCs or S corps, but we have experience representing businesses of all kinds, including:

  • Public companies: advice on restructuring their transactions in the most tax-efficient manner
  • Entrepreneurs and closely held businesses: counsel on entity, merger and acquisition, and pass-through entity structuring to reduce income tax liabilities to their legal minimum; structuring and drafting complex distribution waterfall provisions and related tax allocation provisions in partnership and LLC agreements for investment vehicles and operating businesses; advising businesses on non-income tax questions like withholding, excise tax, sales and use tax, and property tax issues
  • Investors, including private equity groups: representation on structuring acquisition and disposition transactions to minimize income taxes; structuring ownership entities to achieve business and tax objectives

People

Kacie N. Davis

Director + Chair, Franchise + Distribution Practice

614-462-5402Email

Experience

$500,000+ Strategic Acquisition to Expand Environmental Science + Engineering Firm’s Ohio Operations

Business people and construction workers reviewing drawings on a table

Advising a Multinational Blockchain Mining Company in Structuring Intercompany Convertible Loan Facilities

Artistic high-tech image representing blockchain

Lead Counsel in Palmer-Donavin's "Deal of the Year" Acquisition of Diamond Hill Plywood

Construction worker standing on the wooden framing of a home while installing roof trussing

Advising Ohio Manufacturer in Investment from Florida Private Equity Firm

Image of a machining tool spinning fast in a factory

Sale of Northeast-Based HVAC Distributor

HVAC machinery

Sale of Multi-Unit Licensee Businesses

Inside of a modern furniture store

Sale of Kent Water Sports to Seawall Capital

Image of a wakeboard being towed in ocean water with a large splash following

Providing Strategic Counsel for a Global Online Payment Company


Publications + Presentations

Newsletter

Loose Lips: How to Maintain Confidentiality When Pursuing a Deal

Smart Summary Breaches of confidentiality can affect relationships with a seller’s employees, customers, vendors, other business partners and, of course, the buyer.A carefully crafted and robust non-disclosure agreement (NDA), along with a staged sharing approach, is crucial to protecting the seller’s sensitive information when in the hands of the buyer.Sellers also use NDAs (along with transaction-related bonus incentives) to bring key employees into the loop and must develop effective communication strategies with other employees once the deal is done.Before closing, the seller and buyer both have sales hats to wear in convincing customers, suppliers and other business partners that a potential deal will be good for them, too. Loose lips sink ships. While those words took on a very serious meaning during World War II, they also ring true in the M+A world: loose lips just might sink your deal. Most business owners pursuing a potential transaction are hyper-sensitive to confidentiality concerns. What happens if my customers find out? What happens if my team finds out? What if a deal doesn’t happen and my confidential information is now in the hands of a competitor? All of these are real concerns and must be handled appropriately at the very beginning of even exploring a potential deal. So this month we’re talking all about not talking! 1. Confidentiality Considerations with the Buyer First and foremost, sellers are rightly nervous about handing over their most sensitive information to the buyer without any assurance that it will ultimately lead to a deal. In many cases, the buyer is a direct competitor, or at least a potential competitor. If a deal doesn’t happen and the competition now knows your deepest secrets, what happens then? Most business owners are very careful about making sure that there’s a good non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in place before sharing sensitive information. But your off-the-shelf NDA may not cover everything you’ll need in the context of a potential M+A transaction. A more robust M+A-focused NDA should, among other things, cover the following: Clear and detailed definitions of what is protected vs. what isn’t protectedThese definitions will dictate whether the information you’re trying to protect is actually protected, so you’ll want to review these carefully. Moreover, the very fact that the parties are discussing a potential transaction or that the potential buyer has received confidential information from the seller should also be treated as “confidential” for this purpose. Restrictions against both unauthorized disclosure and unauthorized use of confidential information Sometimes “use” restrictions get overlooked, but the “use” part is as important as the “disclosure” part. Requirements to return/destroy confidential information when discussions break downOne of the key protections is the ability to ensure that the potential buyer can’t keep the information once discussions regarding a potential deal have ended. Sometimes there are exceptions to this requirement, but those exceptions should be narrow and impose a continuing confidentiality obligation for that retained information as long as it’s retained by the potential buyer. Reservation of rights and disclaimersThe NDA should be clear that the seller is providing the buyer with access to the confidential information for the limited purpose of evaluating a possible deal. The potential buyer shouldn’t be treated as having acquired any right or license to the confidential information by virtue of obtaining that information from the seller in this context, nor should the buyer be allowed to rely on the accuracy or completeness of the confidential information at this stage. The NDA should address both of these issues clearly to avoid the possibility of creating unwanted rights in favor of the potential buyer. Restrictions on hiring your employeesAs part of the discussions around a possible deal, the potential buyer may meet or learn about key employees. The NDA won’t prevent the potential buyer from using this fact-finding mission as an opportunity to hire away your key employees unless there’s an explicit non-solicitation/non-hire clause in the NDA. Maintenance of attorney-client privilegeIf you’re sharing (or might be sharing) information regarding potential legal claims or non-compliance, you need to be careful not to inadvertently waive the attorney-client privilege (which protects certain communications with your counsel from being subject to disclosure in the context of litigation). A good NDA will address how such privileged information will be handled and preserve the privilege to the greatest extent possible. There are also a number of other issues to be addressed, such as duration, required disclosures (e.g., in the event of a subpoena seeking that information), what happens in the event of a breach of confidentiality, and more. Some of those terms may exist in your “standard” NDA, but will likely be treated differently in the context of a potential M+A transaction. And sellers are wise to remember that they have the right to remain silent! Just because you have an NDA in place doesn’t mean you have to share everything right away. Smart sellers use a staged approach for sharing sensitive information. The most sensitive information is shared only later on in the negotiations when the seller is more confident that a deal will get done. Nonetheless, while NDAs and a focused strategy for how and when sensitive information will be shared are important, it’s still a big leap to actually lift the veil to a potential buyer. Unfortunately, that’s just part of the reality of selling your business. There’s a risk that a potential buyer might accidentally release—or even outright steal—your confidential information no matter how good your NDA is. But if you take the right steps on the front end, you can mitigate that risk and be in the strongest position to protect your information. 2. Confidentiality Considerations with the Team Many sellers are terrified that word of a potential sale will leak to the employees, leading to panic, uncertainty or a mass exodus of talent. Many sellers therefore go to great lengths to keep things under wraps, which may include attempting to do the deal without any help or involvement from the team. That might work for some businesses where the business owner is directly involved in nearly every aspect of the business, but for many businesses, that’s simply not a realistic way to get a deal done properly. As a result, there comes a point in almost every deal where it’s necessary to bring at least some of the key employees into the circle of knowledge. And even if the seller still thinks he or she can “go it alone,” there will likely come a time in the due diligence process when the buyer wants to meet the team and understand their capabilities, commitment, etc. While expanding the circle of knowledge is indeed nerve-wracking, if handled properly, it can actually be a positive both for the employee and for the seller’s prospects of getting the deal done successfully. To do this, many business owners will put in place a special transaction NDA with those key employees who will become aware of the deal. Those agreements obviously contain a confidentiality commitment to prevent the employee from telling others (either inside or outside the organization), but those obligations are usually coupled with some kind of transaction bonus, which keeps the employee engaged and incentivized to get the deal done. This strategy not only helps to keep the employee from jumping ship or worrying about his/her future employment opportunities, it actually makes that employee a partner in getting your deal done. It’s important for sellers to know that these transaction bonuses will almost always be paid for by the seller, rather than the buyer. And while the buyer doesn’t care so much about these transaction bonuses if the seller is paying for them, the buyer does want to make sure that the employees aren’t receiving so much from the transaction that they might decide that they don’t need to stick around and keep working for the buyer. So there needs to be some consideration between paying the employee a transaction bonus package that is rich enough to be worth their time and commitment, but not so massive that it could affect the buyer’s ability to keep running the business after closing. Finally, there’s likely going to be a whole bunch of team members who don’t find out about the deal until the deal is done. The communication strategy for those employees needs to be carefully thought out and coordinated with the buyer. This will be a tumultuous time for these people, but the right message delivered by the right people, at the right time, and in the right way will go a long way toward easing those fears. 3. Confidentiality Considerations with Customers/Suppliers The last group we’ll talk about here are those external business relationships that are key to the business. Customers are always top of mind, but many businesses also have relationships with key suppliers and other business partners that need to be protected and handled appropriately. In the first instance, most business owners don’t want these relationships to ever know that the company is for sale. But don’t kid yourself too much. If the business owner is advancing in age and hasn’t been talking about succession plans with their key business partners, you better believe those business partners are already thinking about it themselves. In many cases, these business partners will be happy to know that there’s a plan for the continuation of the relationship after the business owner exits, unless the potential buyer is a competitor to one of those business partners or has immediate plans to discontinue these relationships after closing. Oftentimes, these outside business partners don’t actually need to know about the deal until the deal is done. So, again, a good communication plan is the key to strengthening and preserving these relationships. However, in certain cases, contractual restrictions may require that the seller obtain their consent to the transaction in order to transition the contract to the buyer. Or the potential buyer may insist on some pre-closing discussions with those key customers or suppliers to understand whether the relationship will continue after the closing once the buyer takes over. In those cases, there’s much greater risk and there’s unfortunately not a whole lot you can do to limit this risk, other than to delay these discussions until as late in the process as possible and to have a sound game plan for those discussions. The seller and the buyer both have an important “sales” job in these discussions: making sure that these customers/suppliers see how the deal is going to be good for them. Next Month: The Dreaded Fraud Exception Read last month’s piece: M+A Outlook for 2022

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
Newsletter

M+A Outlook for 2022

Smart Summary Market fundamentals (excess dry powder, high valuations, comfortability with COVID, consolidation, and more) point to continued strong deal activity in 2022.Looming challenges and uncertainty in the form of rising interest rates, historically high inflation, and politics surrounding tax reform will keep some of that momentum in check.The unpredictability of COVID and its evolving variants (and the corresponding government response to those variants) could significantly sway deal activity one way the other. 2021 was a huge year for M+A activity, particularly in the U.S. The late-2020 recovery of the M+A markets turned into a full-fledged surge in M+A deal activity in 2021. As the calendar turns to a new year, it’s natural to wonder whether the M+A locomotive will keep chugging along full-steam-ahead in 2022, or whether we’re looking at a possible derailment. If we’ve learned anything during the past two years of living a COVID world, it’s that things can change quickly. That’s perhaps more true than ever now as we find ourselves in the middle of the Omicron surge, the highest levels of inflation in a generation, and persistent supply-chain and labor challenges. With those (and other) headwinds at top-of-mind, what can we expect for M+A activity in 2022? As of now, the M+A outlook for 2022 still looks pretty strong—probably not 2021 strong, but still plenty strong. Expect competition for deals to remain high, and consequently, valuations for good companies to remain strong. However, expect a lot more scrutiny as buyers work hard to ensure that they’re able to generate the value they seek while paying top dollar for deals. So, let’s look at some of the factors that may drive continued strength in M+A markets for 2022, as well as some of the challenges we’re watching. 1. Most of the market fundamentals suggest strong deal activity will continue in 2022. a. Lots of cash available for investment – Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but both strategic acquirers and private equity funds have huge amounts of “dry powder” ready to put to work. Lenders are ready, willing, and able to lend in support of acquisitions, and interest rates remain favorable—at least for now. All of this available money, combined with the lack of better investment vehicles in which to park those dollars, means that a large number of potential acquirers will remain very active chasing deals this year. And that leads to… b. High valuations – I’m no economist. But when you have lots of potential buyers with lots of cash, it’s generally going to produce higher values for strong sellers. The current “seller’s market” is likely to continue, but note the use of the word “strong” in the prior sentence. Buyers who are paying top dollar are going to be very choosy to make sure that they’re getting good value for that substantial investment. Sellers who spend the time and effort to prepare their companies for sale through sell-side diligence (including a deep quality of earnings analysis) will be rewarded for those efforts. c. Better handle on COVID and its effects – I’m also not an epidemiologist (though it seems we’ve all become internet-certified epidemiologists over the course of the last couple of years). But there’s increasing hope that COVID will start to transition to an endemic state, at least in the U.S. and other similar countries. Furthermore, as countries transition out of the acute phase of the pandemic at different times, some of the M+A rebound we already experienced in 2021 here in the U.S. may start to show up in other countries, leading to further cross-border opportunities. Finally, industries that have been particularly hard hit, including those in the hospitality, travel, and leisure industries, might finally be poised for a big recovery. In any event, whether or not we successfully settle into something of a less-COVID-influenced world in 2022, we at least have a lot better handle on evaluating how companies operate through COVID, which should give buyers some more confidence in evaluating deals. d. Continued movement toward consolidation – Consolidation is a long-running trend, but it affects industries at different times. That general movement toward increased consolidation will likely accelerate in light of several factors, such as the fierce competition for talent, the need for many businesses to evolve technologically, and the costs of complying with ever-increasing regulatory requirements. e. Using M+A to acquire talent and capabilities – We’ve talked about the “acqui-hire” previously, but “acqui-hire” takes on an increased emphasis given all of the challenges companies face in attracting and retaining talent in the wake of the “Great Resignation.” In addition to acquiring talent, acquirers with businesses that have yet to adapt the capabilities needed to compete in the post-COVID world and to survive supply-chain issues may find M+A as the best and most efficient way to quickly bring those capabilities into the fold. f. ESG focus – In our 2021 outlook, we talked previously about the increasing role of environmental, social and governance (ESG) trends on deals. ESG considerations have gone from corporate buzzwords to critical components of company strategy. Buyers will continue to put a strong focus on ESG issues in evaluating potential targets and in due diligence, and sellers who have a smart and tangible commitment to ESG considerations will be rewarded. 2. But challenges and uncertainty remain. a. Increases in interest rates – There’s no question at this point that interest rates are going up in 2022. And as inflation continues to run red-hot, it becomes only even more likely that interest rates go up higher and sooner than we may have anticipated just a few months ago. While deal fundamentals still generally look good as described above, there’s no question that higher interest rates will affect the deal markets and put some downward pressure on valuations. b. Supply chain + labor pains – As stated above, these factors are helping to drive M+A activity at a macro level. But on the micro level, sellers experiencing supply-chain or labor disruptions will have a difficult time successfully exiting their business. Even sellers who aren’t currently experiencing these issues, but haven’t focused on implementing robust business continuity and resiliency plans, will be caught flat-footed when buyers start asking the tough questions. c. Potential tax reform – By now, we all know much more about Joe Manchin’s and Kyrsten Sinema’s politics and preferences than we ever thought possible. While many thought that significant tax changes were a certainty in 2021—and there was no shortage of major tax changes proposed in Congress last year—nothing actually happened. However, while the Build Back Better Act appeared dead late last year, it just might still have a faint pulse. If that bill—or something like it—ultimately becomes law, new tax revenues will almost certainly be necessary to pay for it. A lot remains to be seen, particularly in a Congressional mid-term election year, but any significant increases in taxes could hurt 2022 deal activity—although threatened tax changes might actually cause deal activity to accelerate in anticipation of those changes taking effect in the future. d. Antitrust enforcement – Most “middle market” deals don’t get a whole lot of antitrust scrutiny, at least in the U.S. That said, the Biden administration has recently indicated an intention to step up its antitrust focus on M+A deals, particularly those between suppliers and customers. How much effect that increased enforcement might have on M+A activity remains unknown. e. End of government stimulus programs – The U.S. economy has performed extraordinarily well through the COVID pandemic. However, we can’t ignore the fact that the government pumped massive amounts of money into the economy to keep things chugging along. As those programs come to an end and their effects on economic activity wane, it’s clear that economic and deal activity will slow, at least to some degree. f. COVID uncertainty – Above, I took a look at the COVID situation from the glass-half-full perspective. But we know that COVID always has new surprises up its sleeve. If we see new and concerning variants, and negative governmental or social reactions to those variants, it’s possible that economic and deal activity takes a big step backward. Next Month: Loose Lips: How to Maintain Confidentiality while Pursuing a Deal Read last month’s piece: Your Definitive Glossary to M+A Jargon

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
Newsletter

Your Definitive Glossary to M+A Jargon

Every specialized field has its own terminology. While it’s handy to have short-hand phraseology for those of us who do this on a day-to-day basis, it can be confusing to those who are new to the process. So this month, we’re bringing you a reference guide to some of the commonly used lingo in the M+A world. We’ve introduced many of these concepts in prior installments, but here they are all in one place. Links have been inserted where we’ve published a more comprehensive overview of certain terms or concepts. To help illustrate, let’s examine each of these concepts through the lens of the pending sale of Madison Hotels by its new owner, Billy Madison, to an investment group led by the evil Eric Gordon. Basket – A limitation on the seller’s liability for certain breaches of the seller’s representations and warranties. Losses for which the seller is responsible to the buyer get aggregated into the basket, and once the basket is exceeded, the seller then has to pay the buyer. Comes in two basic forms: “deductible” basket or “tipping” basket (also sometimes referred to as a “threshold”). Example: Billy negotiates for a $200,000 deductible basket, meaning that Eric can’t make claims against Billy for breaches of the general representations and warranties unless and until Eric has suffered the first $200,000 in losses from such breaches (excluding de minimis losses, as described below). Break-up fee – A fee paid by a seller to a buyer if the seller walks away from the deal for certain reasons. Example: Billy walks away from the deal after signing the agreement because he couldn’t get all of the necessary approvals to close, so Madison Hotels may have to pay a break-up fee to Eric to compensate Eric’s group for its efforts in pursuing the deal. Bring-down – General term to refer to the process by which contractual obligations made at the time of signing a purchase agreement are renewed as of (or “brought down” to) the closing. Example: The representations and warranties state that there is no litigation at the time the agreement is signed. Eric wants to be sure that this representation and warranty (and others) are “brought down” to the date of closing to ensure no litigation was filed between the date on which the agreement was signed and the date the deal closes. Cap – A maximum limitation on the total amount that the seller is obligated to repay to the buyer for losses sustained by the buyer based on certain breaches of the seller’s representations and warranties. Example: If the deal contains a $5,000,000 cap and all kinds of existing problems get uncovered after the closing, Billy can take some solace in knowing that his total out-of-pocket exposure to Eric for most claims will be limited to $5,000,000. CIM – Confidential information memorandum (or sometimes CIP, confidential information presentation), which is the primary marketing document prepared by the investment banker to highlight the investment opportunity and possible benefits of acquiring the target company. Example: Billy engages an investment banker to take Madison Hotels “to market” and the investment banker prepares a detailed CIM to share with a universe of potentially interested buyers to drum up interest in a possible transaction. Collar – A band or cushion around various economic terms in the deal whereby the parties effectively agree not to make certain adjustments/payments to each other, so long as the actual numbers are “close enough.” Example: The working capital adjustment is subject to a $50,000 collar. So, if Madison’s closing working capital is $10,000 less than the peg (see definition below), the collar means that there will be no adjustment to the purchase price even though Madison’s working capital was actually a little short of the peg. De Minimis (or Mini Basket) – A smaller basket that ignores relatively small individual losses for purposes of the indemnification entirely; the seller doesn’t have to indemnify the buyer for these losses at all, and they don’t even count toward the regular basket or cap—they’re ignored entirely. As the name implies, the dollar threshold here is quite low. Example: Billy pushed hard to get a $10,000 de minimis in place so that Eric won’t be coming back on small, nuisance claims after the closing. Billy hates getting “nickeled and dimed.” Earnout – Purchase price that is not guaranteed and is instead contingent upon the satisfaction of some condition after the closing. Example: Billy receives $50,000,000 in cash purchase price at closing, but has the chance to earn up to an additional $5,000,000 in an earnout if Eric’s group achieves certain agreed revenue thresholds during the two years following the closing. EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. Most deals are priced as a multiple of EBITDA. Example: Eric’s group offers to buy Madison Hotels for a purchase price equal to 6x of Madison’s TTM (see definition below) EBITDA. Enterprise value – The “top line” value of the company without regard for its specific capitalization, such as debt. Example: Madison Hotels has a total enterprise value of $50,000,000, but that number isn’t what Billy would get in a sale because of the debt. Equity value – The “bottom line” value of the company that the shareholders actually would receive upon sale. Example: Madison Hotels still has a total enterprise value of $50,000,000, but there’s $20,000,000 of debt on the company. So the equity value is only $30,000,000. Fundamentals – Short-hand for “fundamental representations and warranties,” which are certain representations and warranties that are so fundamental to the transaction that they generally aren’t subject to many of the limitations of liability, such as caps and baskets. Example: Billy remains responsible for 100% of the losses Eric’s group may suffer from breaches of Madison’s fundamentals, such as the legal organization and existence of Madison as a company, and that Billy actually owns and can transfer to Eric’s group 100% of Madison’s ownership, free from liens. IOI – Indication of Interest. In auction processes, the IOI is the first indication from the universe of potential buyers as to how much those buyers may be willing to pay for the company. The IOI is much less detailed than the LOI (see below) and usually provides a range of possible values, rather than a single proposed purchase price. The primary purpose of the IOI is to narrow down the list of potential suitors who are invited to move to the next stage of the process, which is usually management presentations. Example: After distributing the CIM, Billy and his investment banker received 10 IOIs and selected 4 bidders (including Eric’s group) to continue to management presentations. Joint & several – Theory of liability whereby each seller is liable for 100% of the buyer’s losses, even if the seller only owned a portion of the business. While the gut reaction is that this may seem unfair, this is actually pretty typical because the buyer just wants to be made whole and doesn’t want to have to chase every seller for every dollar it is owed. Sellers in this situation oftentimes will agree to reallocate responsibility among themselves in accordance with their respective portion of the purchase price through a contribution agreement or similar arrangement. Example: Billy owns only 90% of Madison Hotels, with the other 10% being owned (somehow) by Frank. After selling the company, Frank blows all of his proceeds partying and chasing penguins. When Eric has a claim against the sellers for breach of the agreement, Eric recovers all of it from Billy under the theory of “joint and several” liability. Poor Billy is now left to try to chase Frank for his 10% share of the amounts Billy paid back to Eric’s group. LOI – Letter of intent. Present in virtually every deal, whether or not an investment banker is involved, the letter of intent sets forth the key terms of the business deal and provides a framework for moving forward with a potential transaction. While most of the LOI is non-binding, certain provisions are usually binding. Example: Billy enters into an LOI to sell Madison Hotels to Eric’s group for $50,000,000 (plus earnout), and then they really start working in earnest on getting the deal closed. MAC or MAE – Material Adverse Change or Material Adverse Effect. Something really big and really bad—and that’s expected to have a meaningful duration—that happens to the seller’s business prior to closing. While this concept appears in almost every deal, a MAC or MAE almost never actually happens. Example: Eric’s group enters into a contract to buy Madison Hotels. One of the conditions to closing is that no MAC or MAE shall have occurred prior to closing. On the night before closing, Madison’s biggest and most profitable hotel burns down—something about a bag of flaming poop outside one of the rooms spreading throughout the whole hotel. Is it a MAC? No-Shop – Sometimes called an “exclusivity provision,” the no-shop is simply a prohibition on the seller trying to find another buyer/deal while engaged with a potential buyer. Usually found in the LOI and, for delayed closings, in the purchase agreement. Example: In the LOI, Billy agrees to a 90-day no-shop while attempting to finalize a deal with Eric’s group. Peg – Shorthand for the working capital target value, meaning the minimum amount of working capital the seller must have in the business at closing. If the seller delivers working capital at closing that is less than the peg, there’s usually a downward adjustment to the purchase price. On the other hand, if seller delivers working capital at closing that is greater than the peg, there’s usually an upward adjustment to the purchase price. Example: At closing, Madison Hotels has $2,000,000 of working capital, but the working capital peg is $2,500,000. The purchase price is reduced by the $500,000 difference between the actual closing working capital and the peg. Q of E – Quality of Earnings analysis or report, which is a key financial due diligence investigation performed by an accounting firm that assesses numerous items that speak to the target company’s ability to produce income and cash flow in the future. Example: Prior to engaging in an auction process, Billy engages an accounting firm to prepare a sell-side Q of E to identify any weaknesses that can be addressed prior to closing, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful transaction. Reverse break-up fee – A fee paid by a buyer to a seller if the buyer walks away from the deal for certain reasons.Example: Eric said he could get financing to close on the purchase of Madison Hotels but ultimately fails. Eric may owe Billy a reverse break-up fee to get out of the purchase contract. Sandbagging – Refers to contractual provisions that allow the buyer to sue for a breach of the representations and warranties after the closing, even if the buyer knew that the representations and warranties weren’t true at the time of closing, but closed anyway. Conversely, anti-sandbagging provisions prohibit a buyer from suing the seller for breaches of representations and warranties of which the buyer was aware at the time of closing. While it seems unfair, sandbagging is actually generally permitted. Example: On the eve of closing, Eric finds that Madison Hotels hasn’t been properly paying sales and use taxes in a few states. While the number is significant, the deal still makes sense for Eric’s group to do, but Eric doesn’t want to limit his ability to recover these unpaid taxes from Billy after the closing. Eric closes anyway and then sues Billy to recover the unpaid taxes. Eric sandbagged Billy, but it’s probably actually something Eric can do, absent a clear anti-sandbagging provision in the agreement. Scrape – Refers to the concept of removing materiality (and Material Adverse Effect) qualifiers in applying the indemnification provisions. So, even though the seller will have negotiated for various materiality qualifiers to soften some of the representations and warranties, those qualifiers get ignored (either in whole or in part) for purposes of the buyer’s indemnification due to the scrape. The scrape comes in two main flavors. The first is where we remove (or “scrape”) the materiality qualifiers only for purposes of determining the amount of the buyer’s losses after a breach has been proven, but the qualifiers remain for purposes of determining whether the representation and warranty was breached in the first place (a “single scrape”). The second is where we remove (or “scrape”) the materiality qualifiers both for purposes of calculating the amount of losses, but also for purposes of determining whether a breach has occurred (a “double scrape”). The double scrape all but renders the materiality qualifiers meaningless.Example: Eric is pushing hard for a double scrape because he feels that the deductible and de minimis limitations give Billy enough protection against immaterial breaches of the representations and warranties.True-up – Refers to the post-closing adjustment made to compare the closing estimates of working capital, cash, debt, etc. against the actual closing figures.Example: Billy and Eric agree to close the deal based on Madison’s estimates of closing net working capital, cash, and debt, but they’ll need a true-up 90 days post-closing once the actual closing numbers are known.TTM – Trailing twelve months. Used commonly in calculating purchase price and the working capital peg because the TTM period is the most recent period, and therefore often viewed as the most relevant period.Example: The working capital peg is equal to Madison’s average monthly net working capital over the most recent TTM period.Turn – This one actually has two meanings in the M+A world: First, a “turn” is 1x EBITDA. Commonly used in talking about purchase price or in terms of how much of the purchase price a lender is willing to lend on.Example: Eric’s group is paying six turns of EBITDA, meaning that the purchase price is 6x Madison’s historical EBITDA. If Eric’s senior lender is allowing Eric’s group to borrow on 4.5 turns of Madison’s EBITDA, then Eric still has to find a way to cover the remaining 1.5 turns of EBITDA.Second, a “turn” also refers to each draft of the definitive deal documents.Example: After receiving an initial draft of the purchase agreement from Eric’s lawyers, Billy’s lawyers turned their revised draft of the purchase agreement to Eric’s lawyers for review. Next Month: M+A Forecast for 2022 Read last month’s piece: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 4 – Meet Your Lawyer

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
Newsletter

The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 4 – Meet Your Lawyer

We now conclude our walk through the Dealmakers Neighborhood with a look at the role of the attorney. So this month, I’ve asked…uh…myself…to share some thoughts about the role of the attorney in your next deal.We all know and love a good lawyer joke. But believe it or not, the right lawyer is not only an indispensable part of your deal team, an experienced deal-focused lawyer is necessary to help you accomplish the two main objectives in any deal: getting the deal done and making sure you actually get the deal you thought you were getting. So let’s dive in and talk about the role of the lawyer on the deal team!“The minute you read something that you can't understand, you can almost be sure that it was drawn up by a lawyer.”-Will RogersOne of my pet peeves is when I’m called in to “write up the paperwork.” Part of that is probably my own ego, but it also goes to an even bigger point: clients who see their lawyers as “mere scriveners” or “paper pushers” don’t appreciate the value that a good lawyer brings to the deal. While there is certainly an art to drafting legal documents, that’s only part of what your lawyer should be doing. More importantly, the lawyer should be advising you about deal structure, negotiation strategy, deal risks, potential post-closing risks and liabilities, tax impacts, and much more. In a single sentence, the lawyer’s job is to get the deal done and to make sure that you get the deal you thought you were getting. For sellers, this means that they get their purchase price and get to keep it with minimal risks of post-closing clawback by the buyer. For buyers, this means that they get the business they thought they were getting, and if the post-closing reality is something different from what they were promised, they have a way of being “made whole.”While that sounds simple, it’s not. M+A deals are incredibly complicated and involve a host of substantive issues, ranging from corporate law, to employment law, to environmental law, to tax law, to property law, and much more. You need a legal team that can confidently identify and handle all of these issues in a strategic, coordinated and effective way.And on top of that, there’s a whole other set of skills needed just to understand how to get a deal done. Once the letter of intent is signed, the lawyers essentially take over responsibility for getting the deal closed. That involves everything from negotiating deal terms, documenting the deal in definitive deal documents, facilitating due diligence, obtaining required approvals, and more. It’s not at all uncommon to have a closing checklist that is 10-20 pages in length. All of those steps have to be recognized and completed in the right order, with expert precision. It’s the legal team’s job to make sure all of that happens and to be in constant communication with the client to help them understand what’s next and what they’ll need to do to get to closing. A good deal lawyer not only has to be knowledgeable in the substance of the transaction, he or she must be incredibly skilled at project management and communication.“There are three sorts of lawyers - able, unable, and lamentable.”- Robert Smith SurteesThat value mentioned above is only realized when you have the right lawyer and you get him or her involved at the right time. I know it sounds self-serving, but the lawyer should be one of the first people you hire on your deal team. If you wait until after starting an auction process with an investment banker or after a letter of intent is negotiated with a potential buyer, you’ve probably already limited the value your lawyer can bring to the deal. I’ve worked on a number of deals where the client negotiates the letter of intent before getting the lawyer involved. After all, it’s non-binding, right? Who cares? Well, you really should care because the letter of intent sets the tone for the whole deal and represents a key point in the seller’s deal leverage. If you miss the opportunity to negotiate all of the key considerations at the letter of intent stage, you may well find it’s too late to do that later. In addition, for sellers, there’s real value in doing a “dry run” into legal due diligence with your legal team prior to the buyer showing up. Your legal team can help you identify potential issues before they become real issues and help you fix them before they threaten your deal. And the added bonus? Doing this work with your legal team on the front-end through diligence and the letter of intent negotiations will help your attorneys get the deal done quicker and more efficiently. A big part of the lawyer’s value is the experience of having done dozens of transactions similar to yours. If you view the lawyer as your strategic partner in getting the deal done and let him or her share that wisdom with you from the start, you’re much more likely to get to a successful closing with minimal surprises or threats to the deal.“To me a lawyer is basically the person that knows the rules of the country. We're all throwing the dice, playing the game, moving our pieces around the board, but if there's a problem, the lawyer is the only person that has actually read the inside of the top of the box.”-Jerry SeinfeldYou don’t call a cardiologist for a hangnail, and you don’t see a podiatrist for a heart condition. But amazingly enough, I see too many clients using their personal attorneys to negotiate a complicated M+A transaction. While it’s understandable that a client would rely on someone with whom they have worked closely over the years and developed a level of trust, they’re not doing themselves (or the other side) any favors by bringing someone who’s not a deal lawyer into the transaction.One of the most important skills your deal lawyer brings to the deal is their knowledge of “the market” and their experience with what it takes to get deals done. Deals often break down when an inexperienced lawyer is arguing for something that isn’t normal for these types of deals or doesn’t appreciate all of the inter-related aspects of the transaction that all have to be managed. Unfortunately, that dynamic can slow down the process, increase time and costs, or even jeopardize the deal entirely. I’ve seen all three.And, believe it or not, sophisticated players in the deal world all prefer that the counterparty be represented by experienced deal counsel. While it seems counterintuitive, they know that good deal counsel will actually increase the chances of a smooth, successful closing. And isn’t that what we’re all really after?So before hiring a lawyer, ask him or her about the types and sizes of deals he or she has done in the past. Ask about his or her experiences in dealing with similar industries and deal dynamics. The lawyer should have total comfort talking about these types of things. And with any deal of size, a team of lawyers will be needed to get the deal done. No single lawyer can navigate all of the substantive issues that arise and execute all of the intricate steps of the deal in a timely manner on his or her own. Once the deal gets going, things happen quickly and there’s a flurry of activity leading up to closing. So, it’s important to understand what the entire team looks like and make sure that the firm you hire has the resources to get your deal done quickly, efficiently, and cleanly. Remember, you’re ultimately hiring the whole team, not just an individual lawyer. Finally, there is still a place for your personal attorney on the deal team, even if he or she doesn’t specialize in M+A transactions. Most good deal lawyers are accustomed to working with existing counsel. In fact, it’s in everyone’s interest to leverage their knowledge and history with the company to help with things like due diligence and personal/estate planning. Believe it or not, lawyers actually can play nice together.And keep in mind that you’ll be talking a lot to your lawyer throughout the deal. Make sure you pick someone whom you trust to sweat all of the details and to communicate clearly and effectively (in plain English) throughout every step of the way…added bonus if they have something approaching a human personality.“99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.”-Steven WrightNow we come to everyone’s favorite topic: legal fees. [INSERT FAVORITE LAWYER JOKE ABOUT BILLABLE HOURS HERE]. In most cases, lawyers do charge by the hour for M+A transactions. There are a few reasons for this. First, the lawyers’ involvement in the deal can vary greatly from one transaction to another. Indeed, sometimes smaller deals require a heavier lift because of the unique issues involved. In addition, sometimes the lawyer’s job as counselor may actually require that your attorney advise you NOT to do a deal that’s going in a bad direction. As a result, large success-based fees usually aren’t appropriate for the lawyer and can interfere with his or her professional judgment.However, in certain cases that are properly scoped out, alternative fee arrangements are possible, including flat fees (either for the whole deal or for individual stages of a deal) and hybrid fee arrangements. Fees can also be deferred to coincide with closing, in many cases. A good deal lawyer should be able to talk comfortably about fees and help you understand what you’re signing up for. But, at the end of the day, the reality is that deals take on a life of their own, and so fees can vary significantly from one deal to the next.It's true that lawyers aren’t cheap. But, as stated before, the right legal team increases your chances of successfully getting the deal done and making sure that you actually get the deal you expected. Like so many things with life, if it’s worth doing the deal, it’s worth paying to do it right.“Lawyers work hard and, like us, they're human, many of them.”-Dick CavettAnd finally, remember that despite what you may have heard, lawyers are people, too (barely). Show your lawyer a little love once in a while because the good ones really do work very hard to help their clients achieve their goals…which is really what deal-making is all supposed to be about.---And with that, we’ve concluded our stroll through the Dealmakers Neighborhood. No, we didn’t hit on all of the specialists that might be called upon to assist in a given deal. Depending on the specifics of the deal, there are a number of other experts that might be called upon to help, including environmental specialists, insurance experts, real estate surveyors, valuation professionals, and more. If you remember nothing else, just remember that deal-making is a team sport. Assembling the right team early on in the process will greatly increase the odds of achieving a successful deal. And make no mistake: it’s equally important that both the buyer and the seller be advised by the right professionals. When just one side to the transaction doesn’t have the right team in place, it can quickly gum up the whole process.Hope to see you soon in the Dealmakers Neighborhood!Next Month: Your Definitive Glossary to M+A JargonRead last month’s piece: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 3 – Meet Your Financial Advisor

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
publication

The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 3 - Meet Your Financial Advisor

This month, we continue our walk through the Dealmakers Neighborhood by meeting the financial advisor.We oftentimes have conversations with sellers who are about to sell their businesses and trade the ongoing income stream of the business for the chance to have a Brinks truck back up to their door and unload. But soon after the initial allure of the big, sexy offer wears off, the question soon becomes: Is that going to be enough? Enter the financial advisor. Most people are generally familiar with the concept of what a typical financial advisor can do, but relatively few understand the full breadth of expertise that a good financial advisor offers and when you’ll need a different financial advisor to help with planning for the kind of generational wealth that can come with the sale of a successful business.To help us better understand all of this, we’ve invited our friends and financial experts Jon Eesley and Clayton Hall from Windsor Advisory Group to help us dig a little deeper into the role of the financial advisor, particularly for sellers in M+A transactions.In this article, we’ll use the term “financial advisor” broadly just to avoid confusion, but know that there are all kinds of different advisors, with different titles and different areas of expertise, planning tools, investment offerings, etc. It’s impossible to cover them all in this short piece. There’s a lot of diligence required in order to find and select the right advisor. After all, you had better really know and trust the advisor you’re giving your money to.---Financial advisors come in all different varieties and are often asked to play many different roles for their clients, ranging from the more traditional investment advice to customized strategic planning for a whole host of personal, family and financial goals that a client may have. There aren’t any one-size-fits-all advisors that provide the same levels of service and expertise for all clients.What does the financial advisor do and why is he/she an important part of my deal team?When thinking about the role of the financial advisor in the context of an M+A transaction, it would ideally be something like this. Develop the Plan. Lead ongoing, high-touch discussions with the client to help develop and refine personal goals and create a strategic plan to accomplish those goals. The key areas to consider are: PersonalBusinessFamilyCommunity and charity Ensure the Deal Satisfies the Goals. Align the deal (or select a deal, when there are multiple options) that best aligns with these goals. In this process, a good advisor also works to reconcile any conflicts between these goals. Focus on Financial Security. Prepare a plan that is designed to provide continued financial security after the business has been sold. The key question your financial advisor should consider is how much you “need” vs. how much you’ll actually get. If there are gaps, then you’ll need to consider whether the deal will actually satisfy your goals. Sometimes a deal that looks great at the top line doesn’t actually provide sufficient net after-tax proceeds to maintain the client’s lifestyle. Understand Tax Planning. The only financial metric that truly matters is what the client gets to take home. As such, tax planning is critical and will include both income taxes and transfer (gift or estate) taxes. The financial advisor’s role in tax planning is to suggest, support and contribute to the various potential tax-planning opportunities that a transaction might provide, and also to recommend other potential areas for tax planning after the transaction closes to help ensure a tax-efficient result for the client. Represent the Client’s Personal Needs on the Deal Team. All of the deal team members (from the CPA to the investment banker) are focused on getting the deal done, and all of them care about achieving the client’s goals. However, the financial advisor—as an active member of deal team—has the benefit and responsibility of being the only advisor who is singularly focused on the client’s personal goals vs. closing the transaction. When should I get my financial advisor involved?”Our experience is that the sooner an advisor is brought into a pending transaction, the more he or she can help. That said, we respect that a pitcher throwing a “no hitter” (the pitcher being the business owner in this analogy) shouldn’t be distracted with a new coach late in the game. But if brought in early during the process, your financial advisor can provide objective advice around the why, what and how of a potential transaction – all integrated with the owner’s personal planning goals. And a good advisor will allow an owner to navigate the transaction with privacy so that vendors aren’t hounding them for business based on the owner’s new-found liquidity. How does the financial advisor get paid?Financial advisors get paid in a variety of ways, each with its own pros and cons. Using WAG as an example, our clients engage us in one of two ways – either a fixed-fee retainer or an “assets under management” (AUM)-based fee. It is important to know that some financial advisors may receive compensation from investment managers or other vehicles in which the advisor places client funds through success fees or referral fees, though Windsor itself earns revenue solely from its clients. Transparency is key here- the seller should absolutely have a full and frank conversation with any potential advisor about how they are compensated and consider what effect those incentives might have on how the advisor behaves and the strategies they recommend. Next Month: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 4, Meet Your AttorneyRead last month’s piece: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 2 Meet Your Investment Banker

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
publication

The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 2 Meet Your Investment Banker

Let’s continue our stroll through the Dealmakers’ Neighborhood and meet our friendly neighborhood investment banker.The investment banker fills a critical role in most middle-market deals by organizing the transaction process, developing the go-to-market strategy, getting the right potential buyers at the table, facilitating due diligence and then shepherding the deal to a successful close. While some business owners are hesitant to hire an investment banker, I find that’s most often a product of not having a full understanding of the banker’s role and the value the banker can provide. I’ve often found that the best bankers more than pay for themselves by running a process that is designed to maximize transaction value, secure the most favorable terms and ensure a successful closing. Most business owners will sell their business only once; it’s worth doing it right.This month, we’re delighted to welcome Andy Male from Citizens Capital Markets, a seasoned deal-making veteran and loyal Anatomy of a Deal reader, to share his perspective on the investment banker’s role in the M+A world.---Every year, the end of September presents us with a compelling trade: the reluctant last days of summer in exchange for the exciting first days of the NFL season. Football fans are always happy to make that deal. September also marks the end of the third fiscal quarter and the beginning of the strategic planning season for business owners. For many, these planning sessions include evaluating M+A as a strategic alternative for the first time, particularly given record valuations and the pending risk of higher capital gains tax rates. M+A can be a daunting topic to assess for the uninitiated, replete with questions about how a process works, how to prepare for a process and what role investment bankers play in the process.Fortunately, there are parallels between M+A and the NFL as outlined below, that business owners can look to for instructive reminders as to how the game of investment banking is played and won. Clock management (aka, market timing) is among the most critical and our predictions for the 2021-2022 M+A season are optimistic. Just as NFL fans are returning to stadiums this fall, so are M+A buyers and sellers returning to the capital markets. M+A activity has returned to record levels, and private business owners are again inundated with calls from prospective buyers. If you choose to explore these discussions, keep the following insights and best practices in mind as you design and execute your game plan. Mergers + Acquisitions: Rules of the GameM+A is a dynamic game played on a crowded field between buyer and seller, each supported by a cadre of advisors driven to secure victory for their respective stakeholders. The score is kept in terms of Enterprise Value (EV) and is most often expressed as a multiple of EBITDA (EV divided by EBITDA). The game's incentives are clear to both parties: sellers want to maximize value, buyers want to minimize risk, and the negotiation process is designed to produce a point of equilibrium between the two. In lower-middle-market M+A (where EVs are less than $500 million), the game is often played between veteran professional buyers and rookie sellers, which can make for lopsided competition (e.g., public company corporate development teams and private equity investors versus multi-generational family business members). As such, sellers need to engage a team of professional advisors to level the playing field. Among the first of these hires is the investment banker, whose job is to design and execute the transaction process. Investment bankers tailor the game plan to meet their clients’ objectives, namely maximizing enterprise value, obtaining favorable transaction terms, strengthening certainty of close and ensuring cultural fit. Relative to the NFL, think about M+A as being played over four “quarters”: training camp, offense, defense and special teams. Training Camp: Market Preparation“TTM EBITDA! Revenue Bridge! R+W, TAM! TAM! TAM! Hut!” When these plays are called throughout the M+A process, your team needs to execute each flawlessly under pressure to win the game. Like in the NFL, however, the game does not start on day one of the process. First, you need to get into shape, learn the playbook and build team chemistry. Welcome to training camp! For the rookies, expect the following:Getting into Shape: Kick-Off Meetings and Quality of Earnings. The process begins with a kick-off meeting hosted by the investment banker and entails a thorough review of the company’s strategic plan. We meet with the CEO, CFO and other executives to assess the company’s historical performance and growth opportunities. Drills we run include SWOT analysis, customer concentration and bottoms-up projection model building. Most transactions include a sell-side quality of earnings (QofE) report, which is conducted by an independent accounting firm. These reports inform the financials that investment bankers use to market the business and are critical for uncovering and addressing potential issues before the game begins. Like in the NFL, we run these drills again, again and again before going to market and our preparation pays off in the form of excellent execution when addressing challenging buyer questions.Designing the Playbook: Confidential Information Presentation (CIP). The key selling document of the marketing process is the CIP, which the investment banker drafts in coordination with the company’s management team. CIPs clearly and convincingly convey the company’s investment highlights to buyers. Popular investment highlights include an unmatched value proposition, a defensible market position, an attractive financial profile with recurring revenue and consistent margins, a veteran leadership team and, most importantly, compelling growth opportunities. Like with NFL playbooks, the CIP is highly confidential, and we protect access to it using confidentiality agreements. Meeting the Team: Roles, Responsibilities and Chemistry. In this analogy, the investment bankers are the coaching staff, led by a managing director as head coach and experienced bankers as coordinators and staff. As coaches, your investment bankers design the strategy, run drills and call the plays. At times, you’ll be frustrated with your coach for making you run wind sprints, but you know they have your best interests at heart and are obsessed with winning. The company’s CEO is the quarterback, the CFO is the running back and the sales executive is the star wide receiver. The company’s infrastructure and systems are the offensive line, critical to success. Like NFL fans, these are who the buyers come to see perform. The most direct comparison is that of the owners. Just as NFL owners hire the coach, staff and players, the company owner hires the investment banker and the management team to execute their vision. And, it’s the owner who gets handed the trophy at the end. The key to getting that trophy is excellent team chemistry. Just like a team of NFL rookies would not make the Super Bowl, neither would a team of inexperienced business leaders perform well in M+A. Veteran management teams with chemistry built on trust from years of playing together win the game. Importantly, buyers don’t want to be overly sold by the investment banker on an opportunity; they want to see and believe in the management team. As such, build and prepare your management team accordingly to win.Public Relations: Managing Communications. Like in the NFL, confidentiality is critical. Bankers limit information sharing to only what is necessary by stage, use code words and execute non-disclosure agreements to minimize the risk of this vital information getting into the wrong hands. Fortunately, unlike the NFL, we don’t allow cameras in training camp and there’s no “Hard Knocks” crew in the boardroom. When the season starts, like the interactions between NFL players and the press, your team will be asked the same questions again, again and again from buyers. Fortunately, you will be prepared to answer these questions like a seasoned veteran.Congrats on completing training camp. Your team is ready to go to work. Time for kickoff! Offense: Marketing the BusinessesThe marketing process begins like all NFL season openers: full of hope, confidence and eternal optimism. Fortunately, as a seller, those feelings are warranted because you set the game schedule. One of your investment banker’s essential jobs is to advise you on appropriate market timing given industry trends, the company’s financial performance and your strategic objectives. Only when those timing dynamics are aligned and our preseason preparation is complete do we start the game. When the game begins, the seller always starts with the ball on offense, driving toward the following milestones:Teaser and Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). The first series entails the investment banker introducing the opportunity to prospective buyers using an anonymous teaser. The teaser provides enough high-level business and financial data to assess the opportunity while mitigating confidentiality risks. A segment of prospective buyers will pass based on the teaser due to their perception that the opportunity lacks a strategic “angle” for that potential buyer, investment size requirements, timing or other M+A priorities. Buyers that execute the NDA will receive the CIP and instructions for submitting an Indication of Interest.Indications of Interest (IOI). The second series entails the investment banker discussing the CIP content with prospective buyers. Over a series of calls, the banker drives home the selling points of the opportunity, the shareholders’ objectives, and what a winning bid may look like. The banker issues an IOI process letter, specifying instructions for submitting a letter, including a valuation range (most often expressed as a multiple of EBITDA). Buyers also outline a history of their group, rationale for bidding on the opportunity and reasons why they would be an ideal buyer. The investment banker summarizes these bids into an IOI bid grid on an “apples-to-apples” basis for the seller to review. This drive ends with the seller and banker inviting a select group of bidders to meet with the company in person, a process formally known as Management Presentations.Management Presentations (MP). The third series, referred to as “MPs,” includes some of the most critical plays of the game. This is the first time sellers meet prospective buyers in person. MPs often include a social element (e.g., private dinner), facility tour and formal presentations by each starting line-up. Buyers give a presentation they have done hundreds of times, providing a history of their group and outlining why they are interested in the opportunity. Next, the sellers formally present the MP, provide facility tours and make clear their transaction objectives. Buyers question the presenters to learn more about the business. Like NFL rookies in their first game, the first meeting will seem really fast, and they will not answer the questions concisely. By the final meeting, your team will have become a veteran squad, seeing defenders’ moves before they happen and answering questions with the aplomb of an All-Pro league star. These meetings often run back-to-back-to-back over a two-week time period, so your team will be tired but feeling good in their accomplishment. This drive ends with the investment banker providing each MP attendee with detailed instructions for submitting a Letter of Intent.Letters of Intent (LOI). Your offense’s final series, LOIs, produces the final EV scores of the first half. Buyers will be given additional data and time after their MP to submit an LOI. As opposed to an IOI, an LOI is a detailed proposal to purchase the business, including a single Enterprise Value and sources of capital for the transaction (third-party debt, investor equity, rollover equity). You can check out Kegler Brown’s other Anatomy of a Deal articles for details on these terms. The investment banker presents LOIs on an “apples-to-apples” basis to the seller for review and discussion. After several rounds of negotiation, this series culminates with the seller selecting a single party with which to enter exclusivity and work together to consummate the transaction as agreed to in the LOI. It is vital for sellers to remember that their point of maximum leverage is just prior to signing a Letter of Intent. After entering exclusivity, leverage shifts to the buyer. Thankfully, your first half has paid off. You have “cleared the market” of prospective bidders, leveraged competition to maximize value and terms and are now in a position to close a transaction with a buyer that meets your criteria. Now, it’s time to play defense. Get a drink, take a breath and get ready to play exceptionally well in order to get this deal done as agreed to in the LOI.Defense: Confirmatory Due DiligenceThe buyer begins the second half moving the ball aggressively. Why? Because their exclusivity clock is ticking, a multi-faceted capital structure needs to be constructed, and they have started spending real money on due diligence providers to close this transaction. For the seller, there needs to be seamless coordination between the investment banker and M+A legal counsel, who acts as the seller’s defensive coordinator through the close of the transaction. Expect the following second-half plan.Time on the Clock: 60 Days. Letters of Intent grant buyers exclusivity for a limited time, typically sixty days, with thirty days being possible in unique circumstances. Ninety days is too long, and should only be necessary in rare circumstances, such as where specific regulatory requirements or exceptional diligence is required.Second-Half Adjustments: Due Diligence Reports. As is fair play in M+A, the buyer engages a team of financial and legal advisors to question everything we presented in the first half. An accounting firm will conduct a Quality of Earnings (Q of E) report. A legal team will review customer contracts, organizational documents and past/pending litigation matters. Environmental, market, and technology consultants may also be hired to study the company’s position. Each party is looking to uncover potential risks to the buyer, and any material issues discovered could reopen key business negotiation points (e.g., valuation, terms, risk-sharing). At the same time, the buyer’s counsel will be negotiating the most important document in the process, the Purchase Agreement. Purchase Agreements: APA, SPA, TSA, etc. The purchase agreement is the definitive transaction document. It is informed by the Letter of Intent and supersedes the LOI in terms of enforcement. If a post-transaction issue arises, lawyers will look to the purchase agreement for resolution, not the LOI. As such, it is imperative for the seller to be represented by experienced M+A counsel. Other important documents include operating agreements, a transition services agreement and employment agreements.Financing Sources: Banks and Equity. Unlike large corporate buyers that use cash on their balance sheet or an existing revolver to finance transactions, private equity firms rely on third-party financing. Those third-party debt providers conduct their own due diligence, which will require lender presentations. Whereas equity investors are focused on growth and upside, lenders are focused on risk mitigation (cash flow consistency, competitive trends, regulatory risks) and your team will be prepared to answer those questions accordingly.Special Teams: Closing the Deal Most M+A transactions come down to the wire. Both teams are battling at the line of scrimmage, engulfed in a cloud of dust. Owners, bankers, lawyers, accountants, wealth advisors and management team members, all there, pushing and waiting for the referee’s official call when the whistle blows. Unlike in the NFL, these scrums most often end in a tie with the ball at the 50-yard-line. Both sides have done great work and discovered the “willing buyer, willing seller” equilibrium. Unique to M+A, these ties are actually wins, as closing a deal is no small feat. Deals can go awry for many reasons, so keep the following in mind as your team plays the game:Laces Out! Both teams need to have M+A industry veterans who know how to execute the fundamentals of a transaction under pressure. Accordingly, the importance of highly experienced M+A bankers and legal counsel cannot be overstated. Counsel is responsible for translating the banker’s LOI into a binding legal agreement and knowing how to negotiate the myriad issues that arise throughout diligence. The banker and legal teams work as one to snap, hold and kick the 55-yard game-tying field goal at the end of the game. Both parties need to have the ice-cold demeanor that only comes through deep M+A experience to do so.Preventing Turnovers. Like fumbles and interceptions in the NFL, re-trades (i.e., lower valuations) happen in M+A. Why? Missed projections and due diligence surprises are the leading causes. If trailing-twelve-months (TTM) EBITDA trends down post-LOI compared to the CIP projections, the buyer will reopen negotiations. The same is true if an undisclosed liability is uncovered. To prevent such surprises, have a banker run the process so that your management team stays focused on day-to-day operations and the required diligence documents are properly aggregated and disclosed. A good practice is that the management team should continue to plan for and run the business as if no transaction was going to happen.Flea Flickers. Creativity is essential in M+A. All deals have negotiation issues and there are rarely easy answers. Like in the NFL, the spirit of never giving up until the clock strikes zero is a key to M+A. Work to the end, exhaust all options, and constantly communicate, as you never know how one proposal may break the issue at hand and clear a way for the transaction to close.The OffseasonCongrats on a great game! You are signing the purchase agreement and the wires will cross immediately thereafter. Where does the money go?M+A Math. Like a coach on a locker room chalkboard, your investment banker will walk you through how proceeds calculations work. You will understand how enterprise value, net debt, working capital targets, equity rollover, seller notes, rollovers, escrows, transaction expenses and taxes determine how much cash and other considerations you will receive at close. See Kegler Brown’s other Anatomy of a Deal articles for details on these topics.Contract Negotiations. How do transaction advisors get paid? Investment bankers are paid a contingent success fee that is typically calculated as a percentage of enterprise value with certain minimums and incentives that apply. These fees are paid only if a transaction closes. Lawyers and accountants typically bill hourly and by project, respectively. Buyers and sellers pay their respective fees. Player Incentives. The seller’s deal team often includes non-equity owners who played a critical role in the transaction. Your investment banker will advise you on appropriate transaction bonuses and other employee incentives for these employees. Eric has also written on these employee incentives before in two parts.Retirement? M+A transactions often create generational wealth for sellers, and as such, it is important to work with your personal wealth management team to prepare for this liquidity. If the transaction results in your retirement, it is especially important to make sure you have the appropriate tax strategies and wealth management plans in place. Your investment banker will advise you on when to bring your wealth manager into the M+A process discussions.Keep these lessons in mind as you contemplate your company’s strategic alternatives…and as you watch your favorite team this fall. See you on the field! Next Month: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 3, Meet Your Financial AdvisorRead last month’s piece: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 1 Meet Your CPA

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
publication

The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 1, Meet Your CPA

If you’re like me and grew up watching Sesame Street, you’ll no doubt remember this catchy tune. Now that I’ve got that song stuck in your head, we’re going to spend the next few months of Anatomy of a Deal introducing you to some of the professionals who make up the “Dealmakers’ Neighborhood” and the specialized expertise, experience, and, most importantly, the value that they bring to the table.Just like the Sesame Street neighborhood, it takes a number of skilled people to make a deal happen successfully. Anyone who tells you that they’re a “one-stop-shop” for all facets of completing a deal is probably not the advisor you want. Remember the old saying: jack of all trades, master of none.This month, we’ll kick off our walk through the Dealmakers’ Neighborhood by introducing you to the CPA. Over the years, I’ve had great experiences with many talented CPAs who truly live and breathe M+A deals on a daily basis…and, unfortunately, some not-so-great experiences with those who don’t. In the cases where things haven’t gone so well, it’s usually because the client’s CPA—while clearly possessing great expertise in helping the client with day-to-day needs—wasn’t well-versed in the unique issues that present themselves in an M+A transaction. So even buyers and sellers who already have a trusted CPA helping them operationally would be well-served to find a CPA with a specialization in transactions to help navigate an M+A deal.To help provide some firsthand insight into the CPA’s role in transactions, I’ve invited our friend and deal pro Kaz Unalan from GBQ Partners to share his thoughts on how the right CPA can not only help you get the deal done smoothly, but also add real value to both buyers and sellers.---Mergers and acquisitions take an immense amount of planning if they are to be successful. No one deal is the same, so having a transaction team full of experts is critical for success. A key member of that team is your CPA. From strategy to execution, the CPA’s role is to help identify and mitigate risks related to the transaction.The CPA’s RoleAt a high level, the CPA’s role is to assist the transaction team to bridge the gap between financial data presented under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or other methods to what the practical economic value and risks are. The CPA is also critical in providing value from a tax perspective in identifying efficient tax structures and identifying unknown tax risk. Significant value can be gained or lost on both of these points. The earlier you can get your CPA involved in a transaction the better. Generally speaking, the CPA would perform procedures and/or advise on the following:Potential “deal breakers”Quality of earnings and assetsContingent liabilitiesTax structure and diligenceWorking capital targets/calculationsPotential synergiesOperational risks and opportunitiesAssessment of key assumptions in financial projectionsAppropriate transaction structure and priceIssues to address in the definitive agreementNeed for hold-backs, escrow, or earn-out provisionsFinancing strategiesThe most common areas in which a CPA would get involved include confirming the integrity of the financial data by providing a “quality of earnings” analysis, quantifying working capital targets, and overseeing tax due diligence and structure.Quality of earnings analysis (often referred to simply as “Q of E”) or financial due diligence is an engagement to validate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). In very simple terms, the Q of E will confirm the cash flow of the business, which is a main driver of transaction value in most deals. In addition to that, the Q of E will validate the balance sheet, determine if there are unrecorded liabilities, identify customer concentrations/seasonality, adjust for one-time revenue or expenses, etc. The industry, size, and complexity of the business will also dictate focus areas of the Q of E. This information can be helpful in identifying areas of potential risk before they become major deal points.Working capital targets are another area that can be very complex and full of surprises in the transaction world. Typically in transactions, buyers and sellers arrive at the purchase price by multiplying the selling company’s EBITDA by an agreed-upon multiple. Before the deal closes, however, the seller can manage the company’s assets and liabilities in ways that reduce the company’s future cash flows without affecting its EBITDA or, in turn, the purchase price. To protect the buyer’s interest in those future cash flows, many M+A transactions include a working capital target. The working capital target should be defined as part of the agreement, but can be very complex as some deals include/exclude cash, debt or certain assets and liabilities. Your CPA is key in understanding this aspect of the deal to avoid unintended consequences or surprises.Tax due diligence and structure is another area that the CPA would typically get involved in. Tax diligence is critical to understand what risks may or may not exist from a tax perspective. Typical tax issues uncovered in diligence are unrecorded state and local income tax liabilities, sales/use tax liabilities and uncertain tax positions. I have seen deals come to a screeching halt because of these items. It may require additional holdbacks until the issues are resolved. These items can be dealt with up front and can save time and real dollars.Tax structuring is an area that can have a meaningful impact to a seller. Understanding the different tax implications of an asset versus a stock sale is a great example of where value can be gained or lost in a deal. Doing extensive tax planning from start to finish to identify implications of structure is key for the seller in understanding after-tax proceeds. This type of consulting can add real value to a deal.The areas discussed above can be done from both a buy-side or sell-side perspective. Most view these services as something performed by a buyer entering into a transaction; however we are seeing more and more businesses doing these “self-assessments” before taking their companies to market. This is often referred to as sell-side due diligence. Sell-side due diligence can add significant value to a business by getting “the house in order” prior to a transaction.How to Find a Deal-Focused CPAAs discussed above, the role of a CPA can encompass many different areas of a transaction. There are many nuances to a deal, so it is extremely important to engage a CPA that has extensive transaction experience. Many business owners have an outside CPA they have used for financial statement audits, tax compliance, or tax consulting, but transactions are a whole different world. There is definitely a role for the legacy CPA to get the transaction team up to speed, help from a historical perspective and assist with some planning, but unless they check all of the boxes below, you should find a CPA partner that does in order to minimize deal risk and maximize your value.Here’s what to look for.Professional qualifications and deep transaction knowledge and experience – Having a CPA advisor who has seen and knows deals will avoid costly real-dollar mistakes, avoid deal delays, and add sophistication/credibility to your team. The value provided will more than outweigh the cost.A full transaction team with deep resources – Finding a CPA that has the time and resources to dedicate to transactions is critical. Once the process has begun, things move very quickly, so being available, responsive, and knowledgeable is paramount. There is no time to bone up or learn new things related to the transaction. Having a CPA partner with a deep bench and expertise outside of general accounting and tax services is also key. Ancillary issues related to valuation services, state/local taxes, IT, and employee benefits often arise. Your CPA partner should offer those transaction advisory services too.Previous experience with other transaction professionals – Transactions are a process and not an event. Your CPA advisor will be part of a team of professionals that is working for your best interest. Being in that world and having a working relationship with others in the transaction space goes a long way in collaborating and making it as smooth as possible in order to get you the best results.A seamless cultural and relationship fit – Just like choosing any of your advisors, find someone you are comfortable with and can relate to. Having someone you truly trust who can clearly explain the nuances is key in such a complex event. You want to be comfortable and have a clear understanding of things.Those on the sell-side already have day jobs, so putting together a transaction team that has the time and expertise to dedicate, navigate and execute a transaction can’t be overlooked. The sooner you can select your team and engage them the better, including your CPA advisor.As you think about choosing the right CPA advisor for a transaction, there is a good analogy to keep in mind. You wouldn’t go to your family doctor for a torn ACL, the same way you wouldn’t go to your orthopedic surgeon for a cold. So why would choosing your CPA advisor for a transaction be any different?Next Month: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 2, Meet Your Investment BankerRead last month’s piece: Post-Closing Integration in a Mad (Men) World

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
Newsletter

Post-Closing Integration in a Mad (Men) World

Smart Summary The time to start developing an effective and comprehensive post-closing integration plan is weeks or months ahead of the closing itself.A successful integration plan will contemplate numerous issues, including identifying goals and project milestones, outlining the right people to contribute, establishing a budget, and more.Many customer relationships are dependent on individual employee relationships, so “finding synergies” in now-combined operations can be more difficult than simply eliminating duplicate roles.The often-overlooked internal communication plan for the employees of the newly combined entity is just as important as the customer-facing external communication plan. This month, we conclude our short walk down Post-Closing Lane with perhaps the most nebulous, yet most important consideration of all: Post-Closing Integration.Really smart people do lots of complex analysis to make sure a deal makes sense economically. And then the lawyers, accountants and others do their part to make sure the deal gets closed (relatively) smoothly and with minimal drag from things like taxes, third-party issues, etc. But perhaps the most important job of all belongs to the team that is in charge of making sure the deal will work after the transaction closes. That’s what we call integration.While it’s impossible to hit on all of the key components of an integration plan and every integration is different, we’ll touch on some of the key considerations this month, just to give you something to think about.To help illustrate some of these key considerations, let’s examine the myriad issues Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce (SCDP) and Cutler, Gleason, and Chaough (CGC) faced when they merged firms to become Sterling Cooper & Partners (SCP). The PlanLet’s start off with a real shocker: a successful post-closing integration begins with…a detailed post-closing integration plan. Guess when the best time is to start working on developing the plan and putting it into action? Before closing! And not just the day before closing, but several weeks ahead of closing.So what do we do in this integration plan? Lots of things, and it will depend heavily on the specifics of the deal, the industry, the specific parties to the transaction, and more. But at a minimum, the plan should: Set out what we need to accomplish in order to achieve a smooth transition (more on this below); Identify the right people to get involved, usually from many different internal and external groups from both sides, such as operations, IT, accounting, HR, legal and more—in fact, these people need to be involved before the plan is adopted so that you have their input along the way; Include a budget for accomplishing the plan—yes, you should expect to invest meaningful dollars in making it work; Develop procedures for addressing problems and resolving or escalating issues quickly; and Provide realistic timelines to completion, together with specific milestones along the way so we can make sure everything remains on schedule.Most mergers aren’t hastily hammered out at the bar between two creative directors wallowing in their sorrows over a doomed pitch to GM, as was the case with the merger that formed SCP. Just as there’s a dedicated deal team working on getting the deal done, there needs to be a dedicated integration team that’s totally focused on making sure the deal works after the ink is dry.And lest there be any confusion, the deal team and the integration team need to work together and communicate throughout the process to make for a successful transaction. If both teams are working in silos, the chances of a successful deal become as fleeting as the nostalgia Don Draper shared while unveiling the Kodak Carousel ad campaign.Synergies + RedundanciesIn its most basic form, integration focuses on how to put two businesses together that were previously run separately. Each has its own distinct assets, contracts, and people, which may or may not be needed when the businesses are combined. These are some of the classic “synergies” that many buyers seek to achieve by doing the deal. But, as you should probably expect by now, realizing these synergies often isn’t as easy as one might hope. It’s one thing to identify the potential value…it’s another thing entirely to actually achieve the benefit. Whether the buyer ultimately realizes this synergistic value depends entirely on how successful they are in planning for, and then executing, the transition.The first step here is developing a detailed inventory of each of these components, why they exist, what purpose they perform in the business, and what restrictions or limitations—legal or practical—limit the ability to move on from any of them. This could be as simple as realizing that the combined companies don’t need two separate telephone contracts anymore. On the other end of the spectrum, what do we do with the executive teams of both companies when we don’t need two sets of executives doing the same things anymore?So, SCP starts looking at how they can operate more efficiently after the merger. They get rid of their separate leased spaces and opt for a single office, with a single telephone contract, etc. Plus, they don’t need two creative directors following the merger. So they’ll need to pick either Don Draper or Ted Chaough and let the other one go. Simple, right. Well maybe not…Transitioning RelationshipsLong-gone are the days where there was a non-descript business that generically manufactured widgets and sold them at the lowest cost possible. In the modern world, businesses are largely built on a series of relationships, both internal and external. These very relationships are often the foundation of the “goodwill” that the buyer seeks to acquire.But how do you transition a relationship? As Roger Sterling wisely said: “Half the time, this business comes down to, ‘I don’t like that guy.’”In many cases, the only way to transition the relationship is to maintain the people who have that relationship. So maybe SCP doesn’t need two creative directors. But they need the relationships that both Don and Ted have. So instead of canning one of them, they decide to keep both. Problem solved? Maybe, but what effect does that have on the thesis for doing the deal, as well as the post-closing culture of SCP? Good question.Culture + People StrategyHere’s where many post-closing integration plans either sink or swim. Companies are made up of people. And those people together create and maintain the culture of that organization.Every business is different, and those differences are reflected in their cultures. Some cultures mesh well with relatively little effort; other times, these different cultures are like oil and water. Both sides must spend significant time on the front-end understanding the cultural differences between the two organizations and developing a plan for putting them together successfully. And sometimes, it’s simply not possible to put two cultures together successfully, no matter how hard you try. A little harsh? Maybe, but it’s better to find that out before the deal is done.SCDP’s laid-back culture meant that Don could disappear for days on end with impunity, so long as the end result worked out. CGC’s culture was very different, and they were thus infuriated when Don went MIA. What gives when the two firms merge?And, of course, there are the meaningful—and sometimes emotional—differences in how each of the organizations treats their teams. If the team performing substantially the same functions at one of the firms is compensated differently than their soon-to-be colleagues, what does that do for morale? Word of these differences invariably leaks, and anger and resentment ensue. And if you take away the “perks” that were enjoyed by the first team in the name of equality, what happens then?All of this is to say that a major focus of the integration effort is to ensure that the teams who are joining forces can actually work together and feel respected and treated fairly. This usually requires adjustments, some of which may be perceived as positive by the team, but others may be much more difficult. Not only do you need to determine the right plan to implement these changes, you need to…Communicate, Then Communicate Some MoreAs a journalism major, I was well-trained in the importance of effective communication. In the world of post-closing integration, a well thought out and effective communication strategy is not merely important…it is absolutely essential.When SCDP and CGC merged, Don’s and Ted’s immediate focus was on the external message—letting their clients and all of the world know about the deal and the great things it will do for current and future clients of SCP. And that external focus is undoubtedly important and a major part of keeping intact those relationships we talked about before.But the internal communications plan is as important—if not more so—than the external communications plan. Everyone needs to understand what’s happening, how it actually affects them, and what the combined organization will look like tomorrow. They also need to hear from you specifically that all of the scary things they think could happen, aren’t actually happening. And don’t believe that people aren’t conjuring up these nightmare scenarios in their head—and spreading them around to their colleagues—just because you’re not hearing those concerns voiced.Everyone on the team has a part to play in ensuring a successful integration and creating the platform for future growth. Letting people know what their roles are and how they can contribute will be critical to success.Change can be scary. But a detailed, properly-sequenced, and thoughtful plan, if properly communicated, can not only overcome some of the inherent objections to change, it can actually build excitement and commitment from the team. Remember that your internal stakeholders are your ambassadors into the world. No amount of well-written news releases or slick marketing campaigns can overcome the damage done by one team member spouting off about what a disaster the deal has been.-----------------Easy enough, right? Not at all. It’s hard work and requires constant attention from an interdisciplinary team. But don’t even bother doing a deal if you’re not willing to invest the time, effort and expense to ensure that the deal is successful.While I hope these articles are helpful to the reader, this particular one doesn’t even try to scratch the surface of how to create and implement a post-closing integration strategy. The best way to tackle this topic is to talk to people who have “been there and done that.” Find out what worked and what didn’t. Oftentimes, the best lessons are learned from deals that didn’t work out as planned. Both veteran deal-makers and their professional advisors have loads of wisdom to share.By all means, still go ahead and do all of that sophisticated financial analysis and detailed due diligence. Just make sure that you and your team remain constantly focused on making the deal work post-closing, beginning with the earliest stages of the process. Keep your antenna up throughout preliminary discussions and due diligence to look for clues about cultural and people issues. Think practically about how to capture and retain the value you’re trying to acquire once the dust settles and the post-closing reality sets in. And make sure that you’ve got the right team together to help make sure that Day One is a smashing success, rather than a painful run-in with a riding lawn mower. Next Month: The People in Your (Dealmakers) Neighborhood: Part 1 Read last month’s piece: Adjustment Disputes

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter
Newsletter

Adjustment Disputes

Smart Summary A deal’s purchase price can be adjusted post-closing based on a number of factors, at which point disputes often arise.  Most adjustment disputes start when the buyer (now having operated the business for a few months) delivers its final calculation of the closing adjustments to the seller. Most purchase agreements leave all adjustment disputes to an independent accounting firm or valuation company to make the final determination. Setting a post-closing adjustment escrow amount can be difficult, and it’s not uncommon to see adjustment disputes in which the amount in controversy exceeds the adjustment escrow. Both parties should make the adjustments a priority and not wait until the last minute to prepare and test the working capital methodology. Last month, we talked about indemnification claims , which are the scary ones because they can be really big, but they’re actually pretty infrequent. On the other hand, adjustment disputes happen much more frequently. And while the dollars at issue may not be earth-shaking, they can still be pretty damn big. So this month, we’re going to take a closer look at these adjustment disputes. We’ve also talked about closing adjustments previously, but as a quick refresher, we’re talking about adjustments that are made to the top-line purchase price to account for things such as working capital (i.e., current assets (except cash) over current liabilities (except debt)), cash, debt, inventory, or any other similar adjustment. The idea behind these adjustments is that the purchase price the buyer is paying is usually a cash-free/debt-free purchase price that assumes a normal level of working capital, inventory, or whatever the agreed-upon metrics might be. In other words, the buyer doesn’t want to pay the full purchase price only to find out that it has to inject a bunch of money in the business on day one just to ensure that it can run normally. As an example, let’s say Globo Gym enters into a stock purchase agreement to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Average Joe’s. When we flip to the purchase price section, it might read something like this: “At the Closing, Globo Gym shall pay to the Shareholder the sum of $1,000,000, plus the Closing Cash, minus the Closing Indebtedness, plus the Working Capital Adjustment Amount (if it is a positive number), minus the Working Capital Adjustment Amount (if it is a negative number, but expressed as a positive number for purposes of this calculation), minus the Stockholder Transaction Expenses.” While in most cases the purchase price gets adjusted at the time of closing based on estimates of each of these values, let’s say for simplicity that there’s a single post-closing adjustment made 90 days after closing, once Globo Gym takes over and the dust settles. At that time, Globo Gym delivers Peter LaFleur (the sole shareholder of Average Joe’s) its final calculation of the purchase price, as follows: Base Purchase Price $1,000,000 Plus Closing Cash $1,000 Minus Closing Indebtedness ($85,000) Plus/Minus Working Capital Adjustment ($145,000) Minus Stockholder Transaction Expenses ($100,000) Final Purchase Price: $671,000 Globo Gym’s lawyers include a long recitation of all the stuff that resulted in this big adjustment, including late fees for rented videos, stacks of unpaid bills owed to vendors, and uncollectible membership fees from Steve the Pirate. Peter is stunned. He never thought that he’d be selling his baby for a little more than two-thirds of what he actually expected to take home. What can Peter do? Sue Globo Gym? Try to undo the deal? Challenge Globo Gym to a winner-take-all dodgeball match? Well, in most cases, the purchase agreement will be quite clear about the process for resolving adjustment disputes. But that doesn’t mean that there won’t be plenty of twists and turns along the way. Do You Realize You Haven't Collected Any Membership Fees in 13 Months?  Most adjustment disputes start when the buyer (now having operated the business for a few months) delivers its final calculation of the closing adjustments to the seller. Even though the buyer is providing its calculations post-closing, it is still required to calculate each of these components as of the closing date. But, now that the dust has settled, it should be fairly clear what the numbers actually were as of the closing date, right? Except things often aren’t as clear as you would hope. That’s because there are often judgments that get made whenever the buyer and seller calculate each of the components that make up the adjustment. And sometimes it’s hard to freeze the company’s balance sheet at a single moment in time in order to make a truly accurate determination. For example, Average Joe’s hasn’t been collecting membership fees for 13 months, but they’re still including those old membership fees as receivables on the books as assets. And Peter feels pretty confident that they’ll get paid. After all, his members have always paid in the past…eventually. Plus he’s got a promise from Steve the Pirate that he’ll be sharing a portion of his buried treasure with him! Globo Gym is much more skeptical that these old membership fees are going to be paid. So instead of treating these old receivables as an asset in the working capital adjustment, Globo Gym determines that they’re uncollectible and writes them down (or writes them off entirely). After all, why should Globo Gym pay for receivables that aren’t likely to be collected? So who’s right? The purchase agreement will generally include some guidelines used in calculating the working capital and other adjustments. First and foremost is the system of accounting that’s used. Most buyers want to require a GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) standard, but lots of privately held companies don’t use a GAAP system of accounting at all, or if they do, they use a modified version of GAAP. The working capital and other adjustments must properly compare apples-to-apples, so we need a standard that provides an accurate basis for comparison. Then we have to articulate that accounting standard in the agreement so that everyone can understand how the adjustments are computed, which can be a real challenge itself. And even when we’ve agreed on the appropriate accounting standard, there are judgments and classifications that are made within that standard that may have a major impact. Given the somewhat subjective nature of these types of things, there’s only so much the purchase agreement can do to ward off disputes later. So Peter and White Goodman (Globo Gym’s president) sit down and try to reach an agreement. But there’s too big a difference and too much emotion involved. So what next? *Thank You,* Chuck Norris!  So now we have a real dispute on our hands. And unlike indemnification claims, which can in some cases be resolved before a judge, a jury, or an arbitrator, most purchase agreements leave all adjustment disputes to an independent accounting firm or valuation company to make the final determination. The first question, then, is who decides the firm that serves in this role? In many cases, the parties will pre-agree on an independent firm in the purchase agreement. That way there’s no fight later about who makes the decision. However, sometimes that doesn’t happen in the agreement or the appointed firm can’t or won’t accept the engagement. In those cases, there’s a whole separate fight to be had about who serves in this role. Then there’s a question about what the independent firm is being asked to do. In some cases, the agreement may give the independent firm broad latitude to make whatever determination it chooses and the parties simply agree to live with it. In other cases, the agreement may restrict the role of the independent firm significantly. For example, it’s common to provide that the independent firm will make its determination based solely on the presentations provided by the buyer and seller and without any independent review or investigation by the independent firm. Also, in many cases, the independent firm must pick a value that falls within the range established by the buyer’s and seller’s respective positions. Alternatively, the agreement could call for a “baseball arbitration” provision where the independent firm can only choose the buyer’s position or the seller’s position—no splitting the difference. But it’s still important to note that the independent firm has broad latitude to determine the final adjustment computation. And in most cases, the firm’s determination will be final, binding, and not appealable (except in extreme cases, such as where there’s evidence of true fraud or a clear mathematical error). So the buyer and seller both enter into this process with some trepidation. And then we still have the question of who pays for the independent firm. While many firms are happy to serve in this capacity, in my professional experience, most of them like to be paid for their services. Once again, the agreement usually provides a default rule, such as having both parties share equally or requiring the “loser” to pay. The latter option also raises some other unique issues because—except in baseball arbitration—the independent firm’s decision might fall somewhere between the buyer’s and the seller’s positions. In that case, it’s common to see a mechanism that requires the buyer and seller to pay a proportion of the independent firm’s fees based on the degree of that party’s success (or failure) in disputing the other party’s position. That mechanism alone may encourage buyers and sellers to be more reasonable in staking out their positions heading into a review by the independent firm because being too greedy might put them on the hook for more of the firm’s fees. And so Globo Gym and Peter put their respective fates into the hands of Chuck Norris and his partners at Norris & Associates, with hundreds of thousands of dollars on the line.Maybe We Could Pay It Off in Canadian Dollars and Save Ourselves Some Money!  This time, Globo Gym successfully convinces Chuck Norris and his partners that Globo Gym is owed at least a significant part of the adjustment. Now, how does Globo Gym get paid? After all, Peter is pretty irresponsible with money; how do we know he hasn’t already spent every dollar that Globo Gym paid at closing? Similar to indemnification claims, most buyers are sensitive to this issue on the front end and plan accordingly. So, just like with indemnification claims, many buyers propose escrows or holdbacks to provide a source of money to satisfy the claim. In many cases, the buyer will want a separate escrow for adjustment claims rather than looking to the indemnification escrow to recover these amounts. Why? Because the buyer wants to be able to tap into the escrow to pay any adjustment owed to it without fear of eating away at dollars it wants to keep available in case of future indemnification claims. And sellers only want to put additional dollars in escrow for adjustment claims if they’re confident that those additional dollars won’t be tied up for 12-18 months as is the case with indemnification escrows. So buyers and sellers will often agree on a short-term adjustment escrow that is expected to be held for approximately 90-120 days after closing, though it could go longer in the event of a protracted adjustment dispute. But there’s always some uncertainty as to how much of the purchase price to withhold for purposes of funding an adjustment escrow or holdback. Indemnification escrows often track the indemnification cap, and while there’s some theoretical risk that indemnification claims could exceed the cap, it’s generally unlikely. On the other hand, an adjustment could theoretically be almost any amount. It’s not uncommon to see adjustment disputes where the amount in controversy exceeds the adjustment escrow. In those cases, the buyer still has to figure out how to get paid the difference. And, because the adjustment should go both ways in most deals, sellers have to think about how they get paid if the adjustment turns out in their favor. Buyers usually say this isn’t an issue because the buyer now owns the business and can simply use the business to generate the cash needed to pay the seller. But in some cases, that’s not enough, particularly when the seller is rolling over equity in the deal. The seller doesn’t want to be using dollars from the business it partially owns to pay the seller’s adjustment; doing so effectively means that the seller is paying a portion of its own adjustment. It's a Bold Strategy, Cotton. Let's See If It Pays Off for Them.  As if all of that wasn’t enough, there are often fights about things that weren’t even contemplated at the time of closing. What if, after the closing, Average Joe’s unexpectedly receives a life insurance payment relating to the tragic death of dodgeball coach Patches O'Houlihan, even though Patches died before closing? What happens then? Sometimes the closing adjustments become a de facto battleground for a whole host of other stuff that would have been addressed prior to closing, if only we had known about them. Those types of claims become particularly difficult because there’s nothing tangible that we can point to other than some vague sense of “fairness.” While most business people believe in doing what’s fair and right, there can often be differences in opinion as to what those mean in a specific situation. But, you don’t get what you don’t ask for. So sometimes, the strategy is to throw all of these items into the mix and see how everything ultimately shakes out. While the theory of purchase price adjustments is usually pretty straightforward, disagreements often arise because you’re trying to capture individual components of a living, breathing business at a single moment in time. That’s hard enough on its own, but it becomes even harder when you add the buyer’s and seller’s respective expectations and biases into the equation. So, what’s the moral of the story? Make the adjustments a priority. Don’t wait until the last minute—as is often the case—to prepare and test the working capital methodology, and each of the underlying components. Make sure it captures the right operating drivers and excludes things that improperly skew the calculation. Then, expend the effort to negotiate procedures in the agreement that will provide for a “fair fight” in the event of a dispute. Finally, hope like hell that everything works out just fine. Or, you can just be like Peter and not have any expectations about how much you ultimately get to keep from selling your business. After all, if you don’t have any goals, you’re never disappointed. I’m told that’s a phenomenal feeling. Next Month: Post-Closing Integration in a Mad (Men) World Read last month’s piece: Oh, Sh*t! Anatomy of an Indemnity Claim

The Anatomy of a Deal Newsletter