Visitors, Employees and Ohio's New Concealed
Carry Law
By John
Lowe IV
The Ohio General Assembly passed Amended Substitute House
Bill 12, which authorizes county sheriffs to issue licenses to
people
who want to carry concealed handguns. On January 8, 2004, Governor
Taft signed the bill, and it will become effective in early April,
2004.
The law prohibits concealed handguns in most state and federal
buildings. And, it allows private entities to prohibit guns by
posting a sign:
The owner or person in control of private land or
premises,
and a private person or entity leasing land or premises owned
by the state, the United States, or a political subdivision of
the state or the United States, may post a sign in a conspicuous
location on that land or on those premises prohibiting persons
from carrying firearms or concealed firearms on or onto that
land or those premises. A person who knowingly violates a posted
prohibition of that nature is guilty of criminal trespass in
violation of division (A)(4) of section 2911.21 of the Revised
Code and is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.
So if you don't want visitors to be able to lawfully carry
concealed weapons on your property, you must post a sign that
says something like, "Weapons Are Prohibited."
As for your employees, you don't need a sign, just a policy.
The law states that it does not "negate or restrict a rule,
policy, or practice of a private employer prohibiting the presence
of firearms on the private employer's premises or property,
including motor vehicles owned by the private employer."
So, if you don't want employees to be able to lawfully
carrying concealed weapons on your property, you need to issue
a policy prohibiting employees from bringing guns onto your property.
Or, if you want your employees to be able to carry concealed
weapons, simply don't have a policy.
The Legislature sought to protect employers from potential liability
in deciding whether or not to allow employees to carry concealed weapons.
The law states:
A private employer shall be immune from liability in a civil
action for any injury, death, or loss to person or property
that allegedly was caused by or related to a licensee bringing
a handgun
on the premises or property of the private employer, including
motor vehicles owned by the private employer, unless the
private employer acted with malicious purpose. A private employer
is
immune from liability in a civil action for any injury, death
or loss to person or property that allegedly was caused by
or related to the private employer's decision to permit
a licensee to bring, or prohibit a licensee from bringing,
a handgun
onto the premises or property of the private employer.
Credits
Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter's E-mployment Alert is prepared by the Labor & Employee Relations practice group.
To subscribe to any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Subscribe Form. To unsubscribe from any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Opt-Out Form. This publication, as well as an archive of previous publications, is also available from our Publications Archive.
The E-mployment Alert is designed to provide general information about the subjects discussed. It is not meant to be all-inclusive or comprehensive. Kegler Brown is not rendering any legal or professional advice by way of this publication.