A recent Ohio appellate decision ruled that a "resignation is a resignation," regardless of the employee's mental capacity at the time. In the case of Escott v. Timken Co., 153 Ohio App. 3d 529 (Stark Co. 2003), the employee became angry over his supervisor's criticism and so he told the supervisor that he wanted to resign. The employee then went to the HR office and repeated that he was going to quit. He then packed his personal things, deleted items from his computer, turned in his company property, and participated in an exit interview. A few hours later, however, the employee had second thoughts and he went back into one of the company's medical offices. The medical office personnel refused to see him because he had resigned. He then sued the company, arguing that his resignation was invalid because he did not have the requisite mental capacity to tender a binding resignation. The appellate court disagreed, and ruled that an employee's mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of his actions is not a prerequisite to the termination of an at-will employment relationship.
Credits
Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter's E-mployment Alert is prepared by the Labor & Employee Relations practice group.
To subscribe to any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Subscribe Form. To unsubscribe from any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Opt-Out Form. This publication, as well as an archive of previous publications, is also available from our Publications Archive.
The E-mployment Alert is designed to provide general information about the subjects discussed. It is not meant to be all-inclusive or comprehensive. Kegler Brown is not rendering any legal or professional advice by way of this publication.