Home
About Us
Services
People
News
Publications

Well done, Ollie. book

Advocate: The Litigation Newsletter

Business, Tax & Securities Alert

Construction Law Newsletter & Alert

Estate Planning & Probate Newsletter

Housing Newsletter

Labor & Employment Law Publications

Subscribe

Opt-Out

Events
Careers
Offices
Contact
Press
RSS Web Feeds
 

October 22, 2001

Employee EEO Training Is Critical

By Larry Feheley

Feheley photo

We have previously advised our clients that training employees in harassment and equal employment obligations is critical. If the training results in the avoidance of just one discrimination claim or lawsuit, it more than pays for itself. Beyond that, as we have noted, evidence of affirmative steps to train employees on these legal obligations can actually limit the award of damages in an employee claim. Last week the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision that dramatically underscores this point.

In Mathis v. Phillips Chevrolet, Inc., 2001 WL 1219252 (7th Cir. 2001), an applicant who was not hired sued the company for race and age discrimination. The case went to a jury, and the jury decided that the applicant had been discriminated against on the basis of his age. The jury awarded $50,000 in compensatory damages. However, the jury also awarded $50,000 in punitive (liquidated) damages. The company appealed the award of punitive damages.

The Appeals Court refused to reverse the punitive damages award. During the trial, one of the company's managers testified that he did not know that it was illegal to consider age in making hiring decisions. Another manager testified that his objective in hiring was to find "bright, young, and aggressive" individuals. Refusing to reduce or eliminate the punitive damages award, the Court of Appeals pointedly observed:

"... [L]eaving managers with hiring authority in ignorance of the basic features of the discrimination laws is an "extraordinary mistake" for a company to make, and a jury can find that such an extraordinary mistake amounts to reckless indifference. Phillips ... argues [that it] made a good faith attempt to comply with [the law]. However, [having a written non-discrimination policy] but then making no effort to train managers about the law shows that Phillips knew what the law required but was indifferent to whether its managers followed that law."

The clear message from the Court was that making no effort to train managers about the requirements of the EEO laws justifies an award of exemplary or punitive damages against a company. Two important lessons are clear: it's important to train employees, and equally important to document and preserve the evidence of your training efforts.


Credits

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter's E-mployment Alert is prepared by the Labor & Employee Relations practice group.

To subscribe to any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Subscribe Form. To unsubscribe from any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Opt-Out Form. This publication, as well as an archive of previous publications, is also available from our Publications Archive.

The E-mployment Alert is designed to provide general information about the subjects discussed. It is not meant to be all-inclusive or comprehensive. Kegler Brown is not rendering any legal or professional advice by way of this publication.

© 2000-2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A.

Mediation Services

Well done, Ollie.

Kegler Brown Publications

State Capital Group

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter© 2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., LPA.  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement  |  Site Map

Member firms of the State Capital Group practice independently and not in a relationship for the joint practice of law.