Home
About Us
Services
People
News
Publications

Well done, Ollie. book

Advocate: The Litigation Newsletter

Business, Tax & Securities Alert

Construction Law Newsletter & Alert

Estate Planning & Probate Newsletter

Housing Newsletter

Labor & Employment Law Publications

Subscribe

Opt-Out

Events
Careers
Offices
Contact
Press
RSS Web Feeds
 

April 8, 2008

Open Shop Contractors Face Bidding Challenges For Prevailing Wage Violations

Gregory photo
Donald W. Gregory,
Construction Law
Chair

Two (2) recent bidding decisions arising from Franklin County’s new Huntington ballpark have ruled that the County can exclude low bidders who arguably do not satisfy the “Quality Contracting” standards, which say that a contractor cannot have more than three (3) prevailing wage violations in any two-year (2-year) period over the last ten (10) years. TP Mechanical v. Franklin County, Case No. 08CVH-01-304 (January 14, 2008); ABC v. Franklin County, Case No. 08CVH-03-3328 (March 31, 2008). Traditionally, prevailing wage violations have been initiated by union representatives against open shop contractors who frequently settled the violations to avoid the cost of disputing the violations.

These cases have broadly defined “violation” as any prevailing wage complaint, no matter how small, if the complaint is not thrown out on the merits. A settlement, without an admission of liability, does not help the contractor.

Open shop contractors are complaining that this interpretation is effectively sidelining them from public work in favor of union contractors, unnecessarily increasing construction costs funded by taxpayers.

The Ohio School Facilities Commission (“OSFC”) has recently voted to allow such “Quality Contracting” standards to be adopted by school districts, and the City of Columbus schools has adopted a standard which disqualifies contractors with more than three (3) prevailing wage violations over a ten-year (10-year) period, a standard even more strict than Franklin County’s, even though prevailing wages are generally not required on OSFC work.

This trend will cause contractors to more aggressively challenge prevailing wage complaints, regardless of their size, and to look at alternative bidding strategies to deal with this requirement.


Credits

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter's Construction Law Alert is prepared by the Construction Law practice group.

To subscribe to any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Subscribe Form. To unsubscribe from any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Opt-Out Form. This publication, as well as an archive of previous publications, is also available from our Publications Archive.

The Construction Law Alert is designed to provide general information about the subjects discussed. It is not meant to be all-inclusive or comprehensive. Kegler Brown is not rendering any legal or professional advice by way of this publication.

© 1993-2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A.

Mediation Services

Well done, Ollie.

Kegler Brown Publications

State Capital Group

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter© 2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., LPA.  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement  |  Site Map

Member firms of the State Capital Group practice independently and not in a relationship for the joint practice of law.