Home
About Us
Services
People
News
Publications

Well done, Ollie. book

Advocate: The Litigation Newsletter

Business, Tax & Securities Alert

Construction Law Newsletter & Alert

Estate Planning & Probate Newsletter

Housing Newsletter

Labor & Employment Law Publications

Subscribe

Opt-Out

Events
Careers
Offices
Contact
Press
RSS Web Feeds
 

November 1, 2005

The Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Economic Loss Rule in Victory for Subs

By Donald W. Gregory

Gregory photo

In a case of great importance to Ohio subcontractors, the Ohio Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-2 decision dated October 26, 2005 that a project owner cannot generally sue a subcontractor directly for economic loss, as there is no "privity of contract" between the owner and the subcontractor Acrobat PDF Corporex Development & Construction Management, Inc. v. Shook, Inc., 106 Ohio St.3d 412, 2005-Ohio-5409.

The Court said that the project owner's sole remedy should be to sue the contractor for breach of its contractual duties, who could then sue the subcontractor for any breach of its subcontractual duties. No independent tort duty exists which would justify a tort claim by the owner against the subcontractor.

This situation arose because the owner and contractor were closely related entities and the subcontractor, Shook, assumed duties similar to a general trades contractor. Shook had wisely deleted responsibility for delay damages in its subcontract, yet the owner was attempting to circumvent that fact by suing in tort. The Court emphasized that the subcontractor could have no greater duties (in tort or otherwise) than those expressly set forth in the subcontract.

The American Subcontractors Association (ASA), in an amicus brief authored by our firm, successfully argued that a subcontractor's duties should be limited to those assumed under their subcontract and should not be extended to third parties or enlarged in scope. This decision will allow subcontractors and others in the construction industry to rely upon the express terms of their contracts and rest more easily once those duties are satisfied.


Credits

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter's Construction Law Newsletter is prepared by Donald W. Gregory for the Construction Law practice group.

To subscribe to any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Subscribe Form. To unsubscribe from any Kegler Brown publication, please use our Opt-Out Form. This publication, as well as an archive of previous publications, is also available from our Publications Archive.

The Construction Law Alert is designed to provide general information about the subjects discussed. It is not meant to be all-inclusive or comprehensive. Kegler Brown is not rendering any legal or professional advice by way of this publication.

© 1993-2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., L.P.A.

Mediation Services

Well done, Ollie.

Kegler Brown Publications

State Capital Group

Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter© 2008, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter Co., LPA.  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Statement  |  Site Map

Member firms of the State Capital Group practice independently and not in a relationship for the joint practice of law.